Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU02722
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/19/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 06/23/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 26, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU02722 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Chinese Baptist Church PROJECT ADDRESS: 2411 East Fort Lowell Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: 4 COPIES OF THE GRADING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: 4 COPIES OF A STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. This site is 1.61 acres. Any construction site that has over an acre of disturbance is required to have Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). It is clear the proposed development is over one acre. It has been requested several times to submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan with the Grading Plan resubmittal. The grading plan will not be approved without a City of Tucson approved SWPPP. The grading plan the SWPPP must be submitted together and the SWPPP must be approved prior to the grading plan submittal. Submit a SWPPP with the next submittal of the grading plan. 4. It is acknowledged that a concrete header (Standard detail 213) has been provided to promote water harvesting into one of the landscape islands. This seems to be an extensive solution to promote water harvesting and costly to the owner. It is also not clear how the parking lot surface drainage is entering the other landscapes areas. It is recommended to simply provide small curb openings in an area with the lowest surrounding grades adjacent to the landscaped island/borders. The small landscape islands only need one opening and it is recommended to provide two openings for the street landscape border. Discuss in detail in the response letter why concrete header (Standard detail 213) has been provided to promote water harvesting or revise the grading plan to show the above recommended solution to promote water harvesting. 5. Be aware the Traffic Engineering Department recommends to provide a "Do Not Enter Sign," at the exit driveway. Revise appropriately. |
| 08/08/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/08/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/01/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |