Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU02536
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 13, 2006 TO: Paul Nzomo, Coronado Engineering & Development, Inc. SUBJECT: 6th and Medina, Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU02536 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan was not approved at this time. Grading Plan comments: 1. The Grading Plan can be approved as submitted and will be approved once the SWPPP is approved. SWPPP Comments 1. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 2. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. Comments 1 and 2 are repeated from the previous review. Since the general permit prescribes different responsibilities to each of these operators, they must be explicitly identified with the specific wording indicated. 3. Part IV.C.3. Include a legible site map, complete-to-scale, of the entire site. The reduced size grading plan does not clearly provide all of the required information in a legible manner. Comment 3 is repeated from the previous review. The provided grading plan does not provide all of the information required on the site map. The additional comments that were provided in the previous review are not listed here. Refer to the construction general permit to determine the required elements of the site map and provide them. One previous comment indicated that the areas to be disturbed and the areas that are not to be disturbed are to be identified on the site map. These must be explicitly identified and must include areas of disturbance that are proposed for areas that are in the adjacent rights-of-way. 4. Part IV.D.4.a. Document where existing vegetation will be preserved. 5. Review the entire SWPPP to ensure that it is fully applicable to this project. Revise the SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/09/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering approval required for zoning review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/05/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |