Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU02536
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit stamped approved tentative plat including landscape and NPPO plans, review will continue upon re-submittal of requested documents. |
| 03/17/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/17/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 04/10/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 11, 2006 TO: Paul Nzomo, Coronado Engineering & Development, Inc. SUBJECT: 6th and Medina, Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU02536 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan was not approved at this time. Grading Plan comments: 1. Include a copy of the stamped approved Tentative Plat. 2. This is the second grading submittal for this grading permit application. Please note that all subsequent reviews will be charged an hourly rate. 3. As previously commented, provide a copy of a soils report/geotech report with the resubmittal of the grading plan. The report must address the retaining wall used in the retention/detention basin and the proximity of the road to the basin since the soils in the basin will be subject to repeated inundation. 4. Clarify the grading limits to include all areas of disturbance. This must include the installation for the bleeder pipe,the various splash pads and slope run out areas. Include enough room for equipment manuevering and staging. If areas are to remain natural and undisturbed, make notations to that effect on the plan. SWPPP Comments 1. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 2. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 3. Tucson Code 26-42.b The SWPPP must be prepared and certified by an engineer or landscape architect. 4. Part IV.C.2.c. Revise the site description to indicate the total area of site and estimate of total area expected to be disturbed. This section indicates that the whole project area is expected to be disturbed. The grading plan and tentative plat indicate that there will be substantial areas that will remain undisturbed. 5. Revise paragraph 2 on page 1 to indicate which of these items are applicable. In meetings with EPA and ADEQ, we have been requested to require SWPPPs to be specific to the project and not overly generic. 6. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. TDOT maps identifies Valencia Wash and an unnamed tributary at the northern boundary of this project. 7. Part IV.C.3. Include a legible site map, complete-to-scale, of the entire site. The reduced size grading plan does not clearly provide all of the required information in a legible manner. 8. Part IV.C.3.a. Identify on the map drainage patterns and estimated slopes after grading 9. Part IV.C.3.b. Identify on the map areas of soil disturbance Identify on the map areas not to be disturbed 10. Part IV.C.3.c. Identify on the map locations of structural and nonstructural controls identified in the SWPPP. There are some hand-drawn symbols on the plan that are not identified in any legend. Provide explanations and specifications for all control measures identified. 11. Part IV.C.3.d. Identify on the map locations where stabilization practices are expected to occur 12. Part IV.C.3.g. Identify on the map locations where stormwater is discharged to a surface water (e.g. ephemeral waters or dry washes) and to MS4s 13. Part IV.C.4. Identify on the map or in a narrative, the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams, dry sloughs, arroyos. As stated above, the project discharges directly to a wash identified as Valencia Wash and one of its unnamed tributaries. 14. Part IV.D.1. For each major activity, describe the BMP, the general sequence for implementing BMPs, and which operator is responsible for each BMP. 15. Part IV.D.2.a. Using specific practices, describe the erosion and sediment controls designed to retain sediment on site to the extent practicable. 16. Part IV.D.4.a. Describe and identify interim and permanent stabilization practices for the site. Document where existing vegetation will be preserved. 17. Part IV.D.4.b. Describe when the operator will initiate stabilization procedures in the timeframe provided in the permit, and what stabilization efforts will occur 18. Part IV.D.5. Describe structural practices used to divert flows from exposed soils, store flows and limit runoff and the discharge of pollutants from exposed areas to degree attainable. (Combination of sediment and erosion controls must be used) 19. Part IV.D.5.a.iii. For a drainage area of less than 10 disturbed acres, describe how and where smaller sediment basins or sediment traps are used along with silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or alternatives on all side slope boundaries OR 20. Describe how and where a sediment basin with storage for a 2yr, 24hr storm per disturbed acre drained will be used OR 21. Describe how and where a sediment basin with 3600 ft3 of storage per disturbed acre drained will be used 22. Part IV.D.5.b Describe where and what type of velocity dissipation devices will be used at discharge locations and along outfall channel. 23. Describe how all non-stormwater discharges will be eliminated or reduced to the extent feasible. 24. Part IV.D.8.c. Describe BMPs for managing concrete truck washout and surplus concrete discharge. 25. Part IV.F. Include copy of a completed and signed NOI. 26. Part IV.H.1. Indicate which inspection schedule will be followed during the wetter seasons.Indicate whether the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 7 calendar days OR the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 14 days and also within 24 hours of the end of each storm event of equal to or greater than 0.5 inches. 27. Part IV.H.2. Revise the monthly inspection description to meet the requirements of the general permit. If the site is eligible for reduced inspection frequency indicate why it is eligible and how it will be inspected once each month AND anytime rain is predicted AND within 24 hours of the end of a storm event of equal to or greater than 0.5 inches. 28. Part IV.J.1. Each Operator must sign the SWPPP Revise the Grading Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2006 | ADRIANNE OLIVO | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/18/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |