Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05BU02320
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T05BU02320
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/16/2006 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 01/16/06

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval.
12/14/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit stamped approved development plan including landscape and NPP plans, review will continue upon re-submittal of documents
12/22/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Robert Caylor DATE: January 5, 2006
Robert Caylor Construction, Corp.
6711 E. Camino Principal
Tucson, Arizona 85715
SUBJECT: Caylor Const. Corp., 8235 S Houghton Rd.
Grading Plan T05BU02320 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 28

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and SWPPP

The Grading Plan (GP) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Grading Plan:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP.
2. The grading plan cannot be approved prior to the approval of the DP/Site plan.
3. Submit 4 copies of the grading plan instead of 3. The extra set of the GP will be routed to the 3rd flr. for scanning purposes.
4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
5. List the datum being used in the Benchmark description.
6. Edit general notes 15 to state that all grading shall conform to City of Tucson Development Standards Chap. 12.0.
7. Provide a detail of the refuse enclosure on the plans.
8. List administrative address/site address and GP number on plans.
9. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed.
10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
11. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site.



Drainage report:
1. The DR has been accepted by Engineering.

Stormwater pollution prevention plan:

Site Map
1. Show, on the site map, locations where stabilization practices are expected to occur. (Part IV.C.3.d) Show stablilization practice around the stabilized entrance.
Summary of Potential Pollutant Sources
2. Identify the location and describe any stormwater or non-stormwater discharges at the site associated with activity other than construction and other pollutant sources such as fueling operations, materials stored on-site, waste piles, etc. (Part IV.C.5) Show concrete washout area..
NOTE: This also includes discharges from dedicated asphalt plants and dedicated concrete plants that are covered by this permit.
3. The SWPPP text report shall be bound for field use facility.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/8235 S Houghton Rd. grad

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/25/2006 BETH GRANT OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/25/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed