Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU02219
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | According to General Note # 10 indicated in NPP plan Sheet 1 of 3 included with approved tentative plat Case # S07-007 " Young saguaros less than 3' in height will be transplanted below nurse plants such that overlapping canopy provides partial shade and protection". Provide the ultimate location of TOS cacti and appropriate "nurse plant". |
| 10/04/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Alan Roberts, RA SUBJECT: 3224 W TUMAMOC DR Grading Review LOCATION: T14S, R13E, Section 17 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU02219, T05CM01969 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted items, and does not recommend approval at this time. Address the following comments for the grading plan sheet labeled "Site Plan": GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.11-01.4.C.2: Clarify the following elevation comments: a) The front entry and guest parking area shows cut condition that does not show that there is positive flow for stormwater. Provide more spot elevations or location of pony wall areas to show that drainage can exit this area. b) Identify rectangular configuration near southern area of driveway. c) Provide clarification of east fill. Provide either more spot elevations or a cross section showing change of grade of 10 feet will be accomplished within property boundary minus 2' minimum setback. d) For wall spot elevations showing bottom of wall elevations, show also top of wall and top of screen wall e) Provide more labels for the existing / proposed contour lines. Also add contour interval to the grading plan. 2) DS Sec.11-01.4.C: Provide the following clarification/notations on the grading plan: a) It is important to clarify actual disturbance area that will be needed to construct the house and yard improvements. Revise grading limits to provide for disturbance area for construction area, construction materials, and vehicle parking. Also, update note for square footage of disturbance for the Actual Graded Area. Also label construction staging area and that it will be revegetated or improved as noted. b) Label heavy duty construction fence location along east side of grading limits. c) Label plan as Site / Grading Plan. d) Dimension footprint location on planview from corner(s) of foot print to lot corner or other monumentation. e) Regarding general note 7, grading plans are required to show footprint location. Delete or revise note. f) Add a general note stating that materials and / or construction equipment may not be stockpiled or parked outside of grading limits at any time. g) Show all linework (specifically, delta and radius for front lot curve see C7) as shown within the lot boundary as depicted on the Final Plat. Clarify/label lot corner pins. h) Add a general note stating that all grading construction work shall conform to City of Tucson Development Standards Section 11-01 and Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) requirements DS Sec.9-04.3. i) Note 11 indicates "drainage weeps". Weep holes relieve pore water pressure for retaining systems and are located below the surface at sides of retaining walls. Clarify whether retaining systems are indicated at these locations or whether these drainage structures are "wall openings" for surface drainage from patio. Clarify / revise this note. j) Label material for driveway. k) Label cut and fill quantities. 3) DS Sec 9-04.3: The Final Plat requires conformance with HDZ Section 9-04.3. Show compliance for this section of the HDZ standards. Provide the following data on the plan: a) Label all slopes steeper than 3:1(H:V) but no steeper than 2:1(H:V) with riprap and filter fabric or as specified by a geotechnical report. b) Label all slopes 3:1(H:V) or less steep and label as revegetation with native plants or as specified by a geotechnical report. c) For any retaining systems, label some top & bottom of wall elevations on the plan, as well as any top of screen wall that may be above that. 4) Address redline comments and return with resubmittal. 5) For future submittals of grading plans, provide engineering scale. Please provide three copies of the revised grading plan, response letter, redline, and a geotechnical report if applicable (see above comments). I can be reached at 791-5550, ext.2204 if you have questions. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 10/14/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering, Landscape and site approvals required before zoning approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/19/2005 | GBONILL1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |