Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU02148
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved plans for the project including site/development plans, landscape plans and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance with the approved documents and applicable codes and standards only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. |
| 09/23/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE:September 28, 2005 TO: Kent Delph, Delph Engineering, Inc. SUBJECT: Bonillas Parkway, Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU02148 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The grading plan was not approved at this time. The following comments must be addressed: 1. The entrance locations should provide at least 24 feet of pavement width. The present configuration does not appear to provide sufficient maneuverability for solid waste and fire truck access. The access routes cannot overlap on-street parking locations. 2. Provide truncated domes at access ramps and in areas where pedestrian use areas abut vehicle use areas without vertical separation. 3. Provide general dimensions for the basin and drainage structures. Clarify in detail A/3 how the height of the basin berms will be related to the weir elevation. The detail appears to indicate that the basin berm will be approximately the same elevation as the weir. Provide a detail showing the transition from the basin berm to the weir. SWPPP Comments: 4. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 5. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 6. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. 7. Consider placing silt fence only on the downstream sides of the project. Revise the Grading Plan and SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/24/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 09/24/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/30/2005 | JMORALE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |