Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU02005
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 01/16/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the CDRC approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
| 12/13/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 12/15/2005 Gas City Houghton/Valencia Grading Plan Comments: Grading Plan: 1- The Grading Plan appears to show one sidewalk scupper for the roof drainage, which is not adequate. Provide additional scuppers that are more uniformly distributed. SWPPP: 1- Identify the minor watercourse that crosses Houghton Road adjacent to the site as receiving water on the location map and in the text of the SWPPP. Part IV.C.2.e. |
| 12/21/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit stamped approved landscape and NPP plans included with Tentative Plat / Development Plan review will continue upon resubmittal. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/19/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |