Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU01921
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Any project that does not have required landscape plans shall have a landscape mitigation plan prepared to show the disposition of PIP, TOS, and required mitigation, as shown in the summary per DS2-15.3.4.B. 2. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per acre must be provided, 33% of tress shall be 24" box or larger. A minimum of 2 shrubs for each tree is required per DS 10.01. Include basin treatment on landscape plan. 3. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/18/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 24, 2006 TO: John Evans SUBJECT: Regalo Del Sol Estates, Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01921 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time. Grading Plan comments: 1. As previously commented, provide five foot sidewalks along the street. The space between the curb and sidewalk may be reduced to 2 feet. This is a requirement of Development Standard 3-01.3.3.A. The only way to have this requirement waived is with a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). However, since the five foot sidewalk does not require any additional space, a DSMR is generally not supported. 2. As previously commented, provide a geotechnical report indicating the soils in the vicinity of the basin will be able to support the proposed retaining wall and providing structural specifications for the wall footing in light of the repeated inundations that will be expected in the basin. The submitted geotechnical report does not address the proposed retaining wall. 3. As previously commented, show how the drainage from lots 5, 6 and 7 will be directed east along the easement as described in the drainage report. Provide sufficient proposed grades on site and existing grades off site to show how the drainage will work as described in the drainage report. 4. As previously commented, provide truncated dome warning surfaces at each access ramp. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan comments: 5. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 6. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 7. Part IV.C.3.c The SWPPP now requires the location of the concrete washout to be shown on the site map. Revise the site map to include the concrete washout. (Original Comment: Part IV.D.8.c Describe BMPs for managing concrete truck washout and surplus concrete discharge.) 8. Part IV.H.1Indicate if the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 7 calendar days OR indicate if the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 14 days and also within 24 hours of the end of each storm event of equal to or greater than 0.5 inches. The operator must indicate which inspection schedule will be used. 9. Part IV.H.2. If the site is eligible for reduced inspection frequency indicate why it is eligible and how it will be inspected once each month AND anytime rain is predicted AND within 24 hours of the end of a storm event of equal to or greater than 0.5 inches. (Provide a description showing how the seasonally dry period is determined.) 10. The SWPPP must be sealed by either a Registered Professional Engineer or by a Registered Landscape Architect. Tucson Code 26-42.b Revise the Grading Plan and prepare a SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and four copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/09/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering and NPPO approvals required for zoning review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/15/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |