Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU01915
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2007 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | December 12, 2007 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T05BU01915 Grading Plans for S05-030 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. There was no copy of the approved tentative plat with this grading plan submittal. Please provide a copy of the approved tentative. Comments by David Rivera for the last submittal could not be address at this time. His comments follow: * * * 09/28/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. Please address all zoning comments and re-submit for review. Include a response letter that details how the Zoning comments have been addressed. 2. Address the following comments: a. It appears that the phase line locations do not match the desription of the phase line based on the lots in each phase. Revise the phase lines as required. b. If the phase lines are as described in the title, a temporary cul-de-sac will be required at Tappen Drive and Atrium Loop. See Elizabeth Eberbach's comments related to this item for more information. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the approved and stamped tentative plat. * * * 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 12/12/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Jeff Stine, PE, EPS Group SUBJECT: Cantera (Dos Rios) S05-030 Grading Plan and Floodplain Engineering Review 3rd Resubmittal LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 10 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01915, T07OT02747 SUMMARY: The revised grading plan package and Floodplain Use Permit application were reviewed by Engineering and a meeting was held 12DEC07 to go over grading and Final Plat comments. Engineering recommends conditional approval of the Grading Plan. The remaining comments shall be addressed in the resubmittal. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Grading Plan purposes only. GRADING PLAN CONDITIONAL APPROVAL COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section 11-01.8.1.A.1-4: Regarding status of differential grading, provide copy of the letter also faxed to Council Office, if not already sent for Final Plat review. 2) For sheet 7, keynote 14, label existing sewer as being "removed". Add note regarding private existing 8"VCP sewer line that exists and shall be relocated in phase 1 of the grading for this project. 3) Address SWPPP comments including: a) Add PHX contact information to cover sheet of SWPPP or SWPPP report, in case of a spill. b) Update silt fence detail. c) The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be stamped approved once grading plan is approved. Floodplain Use Permit conditions and grading permit conditions will be generated at next resubmittal. After addressing the above comments as discussed from meeting, resubmit three copies of the revised grading plan, three copies of the SWPPP, floodplain use permit application, one copy of the final drainage report, copy of the differential grading documentation, latest title report, any permission letters, response letter, and remainder of package. Call me at 837-4934, to discuss comments or to schedule a meeting to go over comments before resubmittal. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 12/19/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved tentative plat including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |