Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01786
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit stamped approved development plan including landscape plans to continue review. |
| 08/02/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Comments to be posted 8-5-2005 |
| 08/02/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Engineering/Floodplain/Solid Waste Review Section comments regarding the Development Standards were addressed. 1. As per the Revised Development Plan, it appears that there are three phases for this development. The grading plan indicates Phase I to be existing and Phase II and Phase III are to be developed. For Phase III indicate development & grading to be "Future" or a part of this review. Correct and revise. 2. Indicate site address. 3. Indicate the Sign symbol in legend. 4. Identify roof drainage direction for garage. 5. Call out contour intervals. 6. Indicate and label existing and proposed contour lines. 7. Area Slopes of 3H:1V require vegetation. Correct and revise. 8. Indicate grate and drainage detail drawings as per Sheet 3, Keynote #19. 9. Sheet 1, Grading Note #18, indicate datum used. 10. Indicate the names, addresses and phone numbers of the firms or individuals who prepared the geotechnical report. 11. Drainage Report; provide Maintenance Note for on site detention/retention basin. |
| 08/02/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 11th, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01786 PROJECT NAME: University of Phoenix PROJECT ADDRESS: 200 South Craycroft Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: 3 COPIES OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND GRADING PLAN. The SWPPP is acceptable once the grading plan is approved the SWPPP can be approved. |
| 08/08/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Comments to be posted 8-5-2005 |
| 08/08/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Engineering/Floodplain/Solid Waste Review Section comments regarding the Development Standards were addressed. 1. As per the Revised Development Plan, it appears that there are three phases for this development. The grading plan indicates Phase I to be existing and Phase II and Phase III are to be developed. For Phase III indicate development & grading to be "Future" or a part of this review. Correct and revise. 2. Indicate site address. 3. Indicate the Sign symbol in legend. 4. Identify roof drainage direction for garage. 5. Call out contour intervals. 6. Indicate and label existing and proposed contour lines. 7. Area Slopes of 3H:1V require vegetation. Correct and revise. 8. Indicate grate and drainage detail drawings as per Sheet 3, Keynote #19. 9. Sheet 1, Grading Note #18, indicate datum used. 10. Indicate the names, addresses and phone numbers of the firms or individuals who prepared the geotechnical report. 11. Drainage Report; provide Maintenance Note for on site detention/retention basin. |
| 08/08/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 11th, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01786 PROJECT NAME: University of Phoenix PROJECT ADDRESS: 200 South Craycroft Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: 3 COPIES OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND GRADING PLAN. The SWPPP is acceptable once the grading plan is approved the SWPPP can be approved. |
| 08/16/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/16/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/18/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |