Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01725
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site and SCZ plan approvals are necessary to continue review. |
| 08/08/2005 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 15, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01725 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Self Storage PROJECT ADDRESS: 4980 North 1st Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN, SWPPP, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, and DRAINAGE REPORT. 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Label all the details on the grading plan. Specifically callout the detail to keynotes 8 and 9. The detail should have some sort of letter or number designation for plan clarity. Revise accordingly. 4. To determine if differential grading is an issue, provide adjacent zoning. DS 11-08.1.A. 5. Show the limits of grading on the plan in a specific line weight that is different from the property line. Show the line weight in the legend. 6. Section Detail B, Indicate the height of the retaining wall for basin B. 7. The top of cut slopes shall not be made nearer to a site boundary line than one fifth of the vertical height of cut with a minimum of 2 feet (610 mm) and a maximum of 10 feet (3048 mm). The location of both retention basins are too close to the property line. The retaining wall shown is Section Detail B shows the footer on the adjacent property. It appears the entire site is being graded up to the property line. This is not acceptable. How will this not effect the adjacent property? There is a minimum setback when grading as specified to reduce impact to the adjacent property owner. Revise the grading plan accordingly and show the minimum setback.. 8. Show the locations of all roof down spouts. 9. Show a detail for the concrete apron indicated in keynote 32. 10. It is not clear what is between the building and the retention basin on the south side of the property. Is it sidewalk? Part of the building? Section detail shows nothing between the top of the basin and the building. When scaled plan indicates a 12' area. Dimension and callout. Clarify. 11. Section detail B is not sufficient. Each basin should have a specific detail showing the location, size and type of inflow and outflow structures to be employed. Include dimensions and elevation of critical portions of these structures. It is acknowledged that the structures have been shown on the site plan. The details must provide specific information that is utilized during the inspection period. Revise. 12. Resubmit a revised Geotechnical Evaluation. In the report, section 2 Project Description it states the development will not have retention basins or a retaining wall greater then 4' in height. This site has two retention basins and a 7.5' retaining wall. This report was written based on the fact that neither a retention basin or a retaining wall greater than 4' would not be on site. The report is not valid. Resubmit a new report. The report must give the ponding limits and the recommended minimum basin setback from the adjacent building. Structures must be set back from ponding limits. The report must provide a recommended minimum basin setback from buildings. Show and dimension setbacks on the grading plan. SDRM 3.5.1.5. and SMDDFM 14.2.6. 13. Per Section B, basin B shows a 7.5' retaining wall and the building will be under 7' of water on north side of the building. How is this structure going to be floodproofed? This must be addressed in the drainage report and indicated on the site plan. 14. Dimension from the building to the top of the basins. The detention basins are located very close to the buildings. Provide a recommended minimum setback from the building to the detention basins. (see previous comment) SMDDFM 14.2 15. Retention basins must be designed to the criteria outlined in the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual Chapter 4, Multiple-Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines. Revise the basins to meet the guidelines found in this chapter. 16. The property owner must provide on-going maintenance for the retention basins. It is acknowledged that in the drainage report Operation and Maintenance Log has been provided. The grading plan must give reference or indication of the responsibility of the owner for on-going maintenance. Revise. 17. Additional comments could be forthcoming due to the amount of comments with the first review. |
| 08/08/2005 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 12, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01725 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Self Storage PROJECT ADDRESS: 4980 North 1st Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. 1. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or microfilmed for record keeping purposes. The current font measures to 10 point, it must be at least 12 point or greater in size. Revise all lettering to be at least 12 point. 2. Include a copy of the AzPDES permit and the NOI on forms provided by ADEQ. A copy of the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit must accompany the SWPPP. Include a copy of the general permit with the SWPPP. (Part IV.F) 3. Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. The operator responsible for day to day activities (the contractor) and the operator with control over plans and specifications (owner/engineer) is required to submit an NOI to the state and a copy to the City of Tucson. Submit two NOIs filled out and signed by the appropriate parties. (Part IV.F) 4. SWPPP General Note number 2 references a Phoenix phone number to schedule an inspection. This phone number would not work since the development is in the City of Tucson. Revise to show the correct number. 5. SWPPP General Note number 3 references Maricopa County Health Department in regards to pulling an air qualtiy permit, again the would not work since we are in Pima County. To receive an air quality permit Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Revise the SWPPP. 6. Provide a description of project and its intended use (Part IV.C.2.a) 7. Describe the intended sequence of soil disturbing activities (Part IV.C.2.b) 8. Provide the total area of site, and an estimate of the total area to be disturbed (include any off-site borrow and/or fill areas) (Part IV.C.2.c) 9. Provide estimated run-off coefficients for pre-construction/post-construction conditions (Part IV.C.2.d) 10. Provide existing data on soils and quality of site discharges (Part IV.C.2.d) 11. In general location map identify the receiving waters within 1 mile (Part IV.C.2.e) 12. Describe construction and waste materials expected to be stored on-site with updates as appropriate. Include descriptions of controls to reduce pollutants from these materials. (Part IV.D.8.c) 13. List sources of nonstormwater discharges including water from dust control, vehicle washing, and concrete washout. (Part IV.D.7) 14. Describe spill prevention and control plan (Part IV.D.8.c) 15. Describe vehicle and equipment maintenance controls. (Part IV.c.5) 16. If sediment does leave the site, off-site accumulation of sediment must be routinely removed to ensure no adverse effects on water quality. Describe how this will be accomplished. (Part IV.D.2.c) 17. Describe good housekeeping practices to prevent litter, construction debris, and construction chemicals from leaving the site (Part IV.D.3) 18. Document areas where existing vegetation will be preserved. It has been identified that this site is in a Scenic Corridor Zone. Show the natural area on this SWPPP. Silt fencing should not be located in the scenic buffer area. Revise the SWPPP. (Part IV.D.4.a) (Part IV.C.3.b) 19. Show locations of off-site and on-site material, waste, borrow areas, and equipment storage areas, (Part IV.C.3.e) 20. Describe Post Construction Stormwater Controls that will be installed during construction. Part IV.D.6. 21. Add in a general note the following information, "Report oil or hazardous materials releases in excess of reportable quantities, or that may endanger human health or the environment, within 24 hours to ADEQ: (602) 771-4466 FAX (602) 771-4505." (Part VII.L.5.a) 22. Inspection requirements must be specified in the SWPPP. Specify the inspection schedule either: once per week, OR once per 14 days and within 24 hours of a 0.5" rainfall. (Part IV.H.1) Inspection can be reduced to monthly if, site has been temporarily stabilized, OR Construction is in an arid area, AND construction is occurring during the seasonal arid period. Monthly schedule must also include pre and post storm inspections. (Part IV.H.2) During Inspection: 1. Verify SWPPP measures are implemented and effective. 2. Note any BMP deficiencies and include corrective action schedule 3. Note any maintenance needs or modifications 4. Certify that facility is in compliance with the SWPPP. If a BMP has been used inappropriately, it must be must be replaced or modified within 24 hours. (Part IV.D.2.b) The following records of stabilization must be maintained: Dates when major grading activities occur. (Part IV.D.4.c.i) Dates when construction temporarily or permanently ceases on a portion of the site. (Part IV.D.4.c.ii) Dates when stabilization measures are initiated and completed. (Part IV.D.4.c.iii) Again all of the above information at minimum must be provided in the SWPPP. 23. Additional comments could be forthcoming due to the amount of comments. |
| 08/25/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/25/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |