Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01722
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 2, 2005 TO: Jeffrey Stanley SUBJECT: Reliasoft, Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01722 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time. Grading Plan Comments 1. The grading plan cannot be approved until the development plan has been approved. Include a copy of the approved development plan and approved landscape plan with the proposed grading plan. 2. Provide details and specifications for the water harvesting areas. Show how that stormwater will be directed to the water harvesting areas to the extent feasible. 3. Clearly show and label the proposed sidewalk along the street. The sidewalk must continue along the whole street frontage in phase 1. 4. Provide truncated domes at access ramps and wherever pedestrian ways adjoin vehicle use areas without a vertical separation. 5. Provide specifications and detail for the "bleed off pipe" shown along the water harvesting areas near building 1. SWPPP Comments 6. Revise page 6 to provide for the removal of tracked materials daily. Also revise page 7 to indicate that the streets will be swept daily if there is any construction sediment tracked onto the streets. Indicate the correct locations for the stabilized construction entrances. 7. Address permanent stabilization practices that will be used. 8. Revise site map Note 8 to comply with the requirements of the General Permit. 9. Revise site map Note 9 to provide for stabilized construction entrances. 10. Revise the silt fence detail on the site map so that the silt fence is entrenched but no earthen material is piled above the adjacent grades. 11. Show the concrete washout and surplus discharge basin location on the site map. 12. Revise the inspection schedule description on page 13 to comply with the general permit. 13. Provide the certification statement and signatures in accordance with the general permit. 14. Since the operator in control of plans and specifications and in control of day to day operations have been identified, the additional contractor narrative must be completed. 15. Since the project is proposed to be completed in phases, the phasing of the project must be addressed in the SWPPP. Revise the Grading Plan and prepare a SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and four copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/03/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit stamped approved development plan including NPP and landscape plans to continue review. |
| 08/16/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/16/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. 5. Please ensure that all sidewalks and access ramps are to be drawn on the grading plan. the gradin gplan should match the approved development plan. Please revise the grading plan to match the approved and stamped development plan. 6. Truncated doems are required for all access ramps that abut a vehicular use area or parking space. Please add a note to the access ramp details about the truncated doems and revise the access ramp detail depicting this requirement. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/19/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |