Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01707
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 08/04/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Grading plan review REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 28 July 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T05BU01707 SUMMARY: The grading and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans may not be approved as submitted. Grading comments are not complete. Comments on the SWPPP's are provided below: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan: 1. Part IV.C.2.e: The first paragraph on Page 3 says to see location map on next page. Provide the location map. The location map must show the receiving water. 2. Part IV.C.4: Clarify the identity of the receiving waters. The online maps indicate that the site drainage is discharged overland to an unnamed tributary of the Rodeo Wash.. This should be identified as the receiving water. Page 7 of the SWPPP also identifies Alvernon Wash as the destination of site discharges - revise or omit as appropriate. 3. Part IV.J.1: Provide certifications and signatures for each operator. 4. Part IV.D.8.c: Describe BMPs for managing concrete truck washout and surplus concrete discharge. 5. Part IV.D.2.a: Describe the erosion controls that will be employed to retain sediment on site to the extent practicable. 6. Part IV.D.4.a: Document where vegetation is to be preserved. 7. Provide a site map that provides all of the required information as detailed in Part IV.C.3 of the General Permit. 8. The submitted copies of the SWPPP have two copies of the General Permit. Only one copy is required. Additional comments may be forthcoming once a complete submittal is received. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov Doug Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 08/04/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE:August 5, 2005 TO: Steven Gregor, Gregor and Grenier Engineering SUBJECT: Drexel Diesel Warehouse, Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T05BU01707 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Site Plan for this project has not yet been approved. Until these plans are approved, the Grading Plan, and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) can not be approved. The grading plan cannot be approved until the site plan has been approved. Additional comments may be forthcoming once the site plan and drainage report have been approved. Revise Standard Paving and Grading note 5 to indicate that all grading will comply with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-02. Provide truncated domes at access ramps and in areas where pedestrian use areas abut vehicle use areas without vertical separation. The plan indicates that the outside storage area is to be chipsealed. Show how material will be transported to the storage area. All vehicle use areas will need to be chipsealed. Clearly indicate the limits of disturbance on the grading plan. Revise the Grading Plan and SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/12/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/12/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2005 | GBONILL1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/15/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |