Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05BU01525
Parcel: 106120530

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T05BU01525
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/05/2005 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Site and Grading review - 1449 W. Kilburn St.
DATE: 5 July 2005
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM02753
T13S, R13E, Section 27

Engineering Division has reviewed the site and grading plans. Approval is not recommended at this time. Please provide revised site and grading plans addressing the comments provided below.

SITE PLAN:
1. Please specify the proposed new concrete driveway apron to be constructed in accordance with Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail 206 (PC/COT SD 206) on the site and grading plan sheets..
2. Please assure all easements are graphically shown on the plan with recording information provided (Development Standard - DS 2-02.2.1 A 20).
3. Provide dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (DS 2-02.2.1 A 21).
4. Revise keynote 9 to specify a 5" thick concrete pad, minimum. Include notation for sidewall bollards to be installed, and specify a minimum dimension of 10' clear inside, between the bollards (DS 2-02.02.1 A 32 & 6-01.4.2 C 1).
5. Depict and label roof drainage arrows and any sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of roof drainage under pedestrian/sidewalk areas. Sidewalk scuppers must be depicted; fully labeled and dimensioned for 10-year (min.) flow conveyance under all sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 & 5.1 E).
6. Please identify whether the sidewalk in the Kilburn St. right of way is new or existing, and depict as 5'wide sidewalk (DS 3-01.3.3 A ).
7. Identify whether the CMU walls are existing or proposed under keynote 6. If proposed, provide a note to construct regular wall opening at grade, for acceptance/conveyance of offsite drainage at historic acceptance points.
GRADING PLAN:
1. Please reflect revisions in response to all site plan comments above, on the grading plan sheet C-2.
2. Depict and label grading limits.
3. Provide a note specifying grading to be in conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (Excavation and Grading).
4. Provide a basis of elevation and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number.
5. Demonstrate water harvesting maximization in all landscaped areas. Typically, these areas may be depressed up to 6" (maximum) with directing of a portion of, or in some instances all, site drainage into these areas to achieve such.
Resubmittal will require a revised site plan addressing all items listed above. Please include three (3) sets of grading plans with the resubmittal package.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov

Douglas Williams
Sr. Eng. Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
07/06/2005 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 07/04/05

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments for T05BU01525:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.
07/07/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Site plan approval is necessary to continue review.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/15/2005 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/15/2005 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed