Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU01503
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | All plants designated by the approved Native Plant Preservation Plan to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction for a distance as outlined in Development Standard 2-15.6.0. Revise the grading plans to retain the existing grades where preserved plants are indicated on the native plant preservation plan. Revise the grading plans to show limits of grading and preservation fence locations. LUC 3.8.6.7.B |
| 09/12/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Frank Petridis DATE: September 13, 2005 FROM: Jose Ortiz; Engineering Division ADDRESS 168 S. Randolph Way; Tucson, AZ 85716 SUBJECT: Privada Colonia Solana Lots Grading Plan T05BU01503 (Third Review) T14S, R14E, Section 16 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, approved Tentative Plat, and Drainage Report The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Provide all City of Tucson red lines during the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Callout limits of grading. Per sheet 2 section C-C of the grading plan it appears that work will be done on the adjacent lot therefore limits of this work need to be callout, or line work needs to indicate where the existing grades is located. Dash the existing line work in the cross sections. In addition, per Development Standards No 2-03.2.4.L.5 adjacent owner's permission maybe required due to the additional grading taking place on that property owner's lot. 3. The proposed FFE should not be placed more then 2 feet above the existing grades. The southern lots are too high and need to be lowered. 4. Parts of the plans are difficult to read due to leader notes crossing one another, two different font colors, over lapping text, and so on. Drainage report: Comments addressed To expedite the review process it is recommended that we gather for a meeting to address these comments. At you earliest convenience please call me at 791-5550 x1191 or at Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov to set up a time and location for our meeting. Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 09/17/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 09/17/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |