Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU01503
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit revised Native Plant Preservation Plan per Development Standard 2-15.3.0 or a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the approved tentative plat. 2. Submit an aerial photograph with revised NPP plan, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2-15.3.1.A.2 3. Preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan or letter as required under LUC 3.8.6.7.D shall be performed by a plant professional, such as: · A landscape architect. · An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture. · A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. |
| 08/05/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Frank Petridis DATE: August 15, 2005 168 S. Randolph Way FROM: Jose Ortiz Tucson, Arizona 85716 Engineering Division SUBJECT: Privada Colonia Solana Lots Grading Plan T05BU01503 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 16 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, approved Tentative Plat, and Drainage Report The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Provide all City of Tucson red lines during the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Show all symbols in the legend. Legend may need to be updated to show all additional items including all survey, utility info (i.e. Manholes), definition to 'FP" & "FFE", drainage info (i.e. Rip rap), and so on. 3. Disregard previous comments in regards to clouding revisions. Remove all clouds on the grading plans. 4. Callout limits of grading. Per sheet 2 section C-C of the grading plan it appears that work will be done on the adjacent lot therefore limits of this work need to be callout. In addition, per Development Standards No 2-03.2.4.L.5 adjacent owner's permission maybe required due to the additional grading taking place on that property owner's lot. 5. Show details of all surface materials. This should include pavement thickness and any other underlying structural course (i.e. AB). 6. To ensure that there is no nuisance ponding on this project please callout all locations of the detail to wall openings. Are wall openings going to be provided on each lot? 7. Distinguish the difference between FP and FFE. 8. The response letter to Engineering comments indicates that there are no grade breaks. How does this site handle storm water running along Broadway Blvd? May need to prevent Broadway Blvd. storm water from entering the proposed site. 9. Call out slopes on section B-B, should not exceed 4:1 slopes. 10. Parts of the plans are difficult to read due to leader notes crossing one another, two different font colors, over lapping text, and so on. Drainage report: Comments addressed To expedite the review process it is recommended that we gather for a meeting to address these comments. At you earliest convenience please call me at 791-5550 x1191 or at Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov to set up a time and location for our meeting. Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 08/25/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/25/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/31/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |