Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05BU01282
Parcel: 11804188D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T05BU01282
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/10/2005 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Grading plan review
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 10 June 2005
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T05BU01282

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the subject grading plan and approval is not recommended at this time. Please address all comments provided below:

GRADING PLAN:
1. Depict and label limits of grading/area to be disturbed on the plan. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) with text and all appropriate certifications/signatures if the area to be disturbed is an acre or greater.
2. Revise General Grading Notes 2 and 12 to specify that site grading is to be in compliance with City Development Standard 11-01.0 (Excavation and Grading).
3. Provide proposed finished pad grades, accurately labeled.
4. Specify construction of a driveway apron (PC/COT SD 206) west of Lot 4 for access to this lot.
5. Provide a note to construct curb transitions (PC/COT SD 210) west of Lots 1 and 4.
6. A pedestrian easement must be created and recorded with recording information provided on the plan for those areas where the new public sidewalk is proposed to be constructed in the right of way.
7. Specify construction of a 5 foot sidewalk on both sides of the Ingress/Egress in Road Section A/2 and in keynote 3.
8. Specify a minimum 2' shy space in Section F/2 for utilities, water meters, signage, etc.
9. Provide Section G/2.
10. The proposed structure for Lot 6 falls within the minimum setback recommendations in the Pavement Engineering and Basin Setback Report. Please address or revise as necessary.
11. Due to concerns regarding post-construction basin infiltration, please add the following general grading note: "Infiltration test results shall be submitted upon basin completion, after 90% grading construction is completed. Final grading approval shall be held until functions of basins are determined to meet design requirements as specified per the approved drainage and geotechnical reports"
Listed below are some of the minimum items that must be addressed with a SWPPP. For additional information, go to: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf
http://www.azdeq.gov/function/forms/appswater.html
1. Depiction and labeling of appropriate erosion and sediment controls.
2. A stabilized construction entrance with detail provided.
3. Include a copy of the Arizona Construction General Permit with the text.
4. Depict an appropriate concrete washout location and protected materials storage location.
5. Provide all owner/operator and contractor certifications.
6. A copy of the signed Notice Of Intent (NOI).
7. These items must be kept on the job site at all times until construction activity ceases and submission of a Notice of Termination (NOT) has occurred.
Additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plan.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
06/15/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 06/15/05

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
06/15/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit stamped approved tentative plat including landscape and NPP plans to continue review.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/23/2005 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/23/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed