Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01122
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Maneesh Dwivedi DATE: May 31, 2005 K & I Architechs 1850 N. Central Ave. Ste 200 Tucson, Arizona 85710 SUBJECT: 7885 E. Speedway Blvd. Grading plan T05BU01122 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 26 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP), Drainage Report (DR) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. The GP, DR and SWPPP cannot be approved prior to the approval of the Site plan. 3. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting". 4. List administrative address/site address on plans. 5. List Site plan number on the grading plans. 6. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed. 7. Call out surface paving material. 8. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 9. Delineate 100-year W.S.E.L., Floodplain and erosion hazard setback. 10. Show top of banks (20 ft. maintenance easement - 50 ft. study area). 11. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance and for the xeroraparian intermediate habitat. 12. Call out the names of all washes. 13. Show the 100-year flood peak discharge. 14. Slopes of 3H: 1V require hand placed riprap. 15. Slopes of 2H: 1V or greater require grouted riprap. 16. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. 17. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 18. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme. 19. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 20. Detention/Retention: · Security barriers are required if ponding depth exceeds 2 feet, if slopes are greater than 4:1 and/or if pedestrian access is adjacent to basin. · Peak discharge at basin's outlet. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The FFE for the building is excessively high. The proposed building is over 350 feet away from the high WSEL. Why is the building proposed to be so high? Adjust building or give justification for elevating building so high. 3. Sec TCC Sec. 26-5.2. (4), development in the floodway fringe "may not unnecessarily alter riparian habitats of watercourse and adjacent bank areas". The parcel is designated as Critical and Sensitive Biological Community, (Shaw 1986) & is designated by Pima County as Hydroriparian or Mesoriparian and as an Important Riparian Area under the Conservation Lands System of the the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. A new DR may be necessary. 4. A mitigation plan is required for any disturbance in the 50' resource zone of the xeroraparian intermediate habitat. 5. Per Sec TCC Sec. 26-5.2. (1), development "in the floodway fringe is required to conform to adopted city land use plans for the design of public and private development in the floodplain". A new DR may be necessary. 6. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and maintenance checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: Operators Identify all operators for the project site, and the areas over which each operator has control. (Part IV.C.1) Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). (Part IV.B.2.c) Indicate in the SWPPP the areas of the project where the operator has operational control over project specifications, including the ability to make modifications in specifications. (Part IV.B.1.b) Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with day-to-day operational control of those activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. Provide a table for recording the names and responsibilities for each party responsible for activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. (Part IV.B.1.d) Indicate in the SWPPP the areas of the project where each operator has operational control over day-to-day activities. (Part IV.B.2.c) Stabilization Practices 1. The operator must maintain the following records as part of the SWPPP. Provide pages to record the required information. (Part IV.D.4.c) a. Dates when major grading activities occur. (Part IV.D.4.c.i) b. Dates when construction activities temporarily or permanently cease on a portion of the site. (Part IV.D.4.c.ii) c. Dates when stabilization measures are initiated and completed and reasons for delay, if applicable, under IV.D.4.b. (Part IV.D.4.c.iii) 2. Describe measures to minimize the generation of dust. (Part IV.D.8.b) 3. Describe measures to sufficiently stabilize soil at culvert locations to prevent the formation of rills and gullies during construction. (Part IV.D.8.e) Permit Related Records 4. Include a copy of the general permit and the NOI that was or will be submitted to ADEQ. If other agreements with any state, local, or federal agencies exist that would affect the provisions or implementation of the SWPPP, include copies of those agreements. (Part IV.F) Inspections 5. Add a note stating that the operator(s) shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours: Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1) Phoenix, AZ 85007 Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505 Signature Requirements 6. Include a certification and signature for each operator in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1) 7. All NOIs must be signed and certified as follows: a) For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Part, a responsible corporate officer means: i) A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation; or ii) The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. b) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: By a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or c) For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency is the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g. Regional Administrators of EPA.). If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7885 E. Speedway Blvd. grad |
| 05/25/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 5/25/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner for: David Revira Principal Planner Comments for activity #T05BU01122: 1. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan or development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site/development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next submittal. If you have any comments or questions, contact Terry Stevens @ 791-5608 ext. 2000 |
| 06/02/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/08/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |