Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01027
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/12/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Grading Plan 1. Indicate existing and proposed grades. Indicate grade breaks. Indicate a symbol of each in the legend. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16 Use a different line type and weight. 2. The proposed finish floor elevation appears to be two feet above existing grade. This indicates to be a differential grading issue as per Section 13.1 This criteria applies to all non-residential developments, and all residential developments with lots that are less than 24,000 square feet, that are adjacent to an existing residential development or residentially zoned property (excepting multifamily developments greater than single story), or unsubdivided non-commercial property. Correct and revise. 3. Correct Datum to read NAVD 88. |
| 05/20/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement (Application for Exception) indicating that Protected Native Plants are not impacted on the subject site. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C. Include the locations of preserve in place plants on landscape plan. 2) Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 06/06/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering and NPPO approvals are required. Site plan approval is also required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |