Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU00784
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2005 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD Engineering Comments for T05BU00784 DSD Engineering does not recommend approval of this plan and offers the following comments: 1. Sheet 1, General Note #3: The grading standards are now within the Development Standards DS 11-01.0) and not the building codes. Please change the note to reflect this. 2. Sheet 1, General Note #14: Please indicate the basis of elevation and indicate whether it's based on NAVD88 or NGVD29. 3. Sheet 2: It appears that there is excavation to take place east of the tee located between the words (100-yr floodplain" and "Q100-6747 cfs". Excavation in this area may cause breakout due to Santa Cruz River flows or increase breakout that already occurs. Breakout in this area does not appear to be directed toward a lake. It is highly recommended that this area not be lowered and, in general, areas near the Camino De Oeste Wash channel not be excavated for the same reason. 4. Sheet 2: Indicate floodplain boundaries and water surface elevations (incl. floodplain and water surface elevations associated with the Santa Cruz River). If applicable, show the regulatory floodway boundary. 5. Sheet 3: Indicate floodplain boundaries and water surface elevations (incl. floodplain and water surface elevations associated with the Santa Cruz River). If applicable, show the regulatory floodway boundary. 6. Sheet 2 & 3: Indicate applicable cut or fill setback in accordance with the Development Standards. 7. Drainage Statement: Please note that the HEC-2 analysis appears to use transposed digits (6474 v. 6747) for the hydraulic analyses. No appreciable change is expected in the hydraulic results. However, if the results are to be submitted to another agency for review, the flow value should be corrected. 8. Drainage Statement: The text indicates that breakout overflows to the west. Based upon the topography, it appears that breakout could go east or west. Please justify the assertion that breakout will proceed westward and will not change due to construction. 9. Sheet 2 & 3: Clearly indicate grading limits. Work within the wash may trigger AZPDES and/or 404 violations. This may include pollution controls and removal of pollutants within the Camino De Oeste Wash. See also Comment #10. 10. Drainage Statement: Not being within a "Nationwide 404 Permitting Area", as shown on Figure 7, is disadvantageous, rather than advantageous. Areas outside the "Nationwide 404 Permitting Area" may require endangered species surveys and/or individual permitting for 404-regulated activities. Changing the text in Section 1a is in order. 11. SWPPP Sheet 1: Please change the address in General Note #1 of the golf course to 3200 N Silverbell. 12. SWPPP Sheet 1: The construction area looks to be much larger than 32 acres. Please revise General Note #3 accordingly. 13. SWPPP Sheet 1: Please change Note #1 to City of Tucson rather than Pima County. 14. SWPPP Sheet 1: Please provide the narrative booklet cited in Note #4. 15. SWPPP Sheet 2: Filter socks are indicated along the eastern and northern sides of the project, but the size isn't indicated. Please indicate the appropriate size on the plan. 16. SWPPP Sheet 2: Please indicate the appropriate control measures along the western boundary. It appears there are areas that will be disturbed and flow westward onto other parcels. 17. SWPPP Sheet 2: There appears to be a low spot or culvert located along the Santa Cruz River bank protection about 900 feet west of Camino De Oeste Wash. Address the proper control measures at this location. 18. SWPPP Sheet 3: Address how vehicles will prevent tracking onto other properties. Tracking shall be prevented even if the other areas are not paved. 19. SWPPP Sheet 2: Please locate the stabilized construction entrances. None are indicated on the plan. 20. SWPPP Sheet 3: Note 6.1.16: This project is within City of Tucson jurisdiction. Revise note as necessary. 21. SWPPP Sheet 3: Indicate the sequencing. 22. SWPPP Sheet 3: Items #10 & #11 shall be signed. 23. SWPPP Sheet 3: Address pollution control measures from the time vehicles leave this site until the excavation is placed and stabilized elsewhere. 24. SWPPP Sheet 2: Remove the straw bales indicated for installation in the Camino De Oeste Wash. Wrap controls (silt fence and filter socks), which are indicated for installation along top of wash and Santa Cruz River, so that they prevent pollutants from entering wash. Matt Flick, PE Engineering Manager 18APR05 |
| 04/19/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN IS APPROVED. SUBMIT REVISED GRADING PLANS AND THE APPROVED OR REVISED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANS. THE PERMIT MAY BE APPROVED ONLY CONDITIONALLY PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED PRE-GRADING INSPECTION. |
| 04/22/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 04/22/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submitttal. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/25/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |