Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU00687
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | APPLICANT: Jeff Stanley, PE SUBJECT: Andrew Lauren Grading Plan Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R14E Section 31 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU00687 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan T05CM00375 with a copy of the Site / Development Plan (T05CM00375 / D04-0037) was received by Engineering who has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Grading Plan. Address the following comments: GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Development Standards (DS) Section 11-01.4.1.F: Add sheet numbering to each plan sheet. 2) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.F.1.b: Address the following elevation comments: a) Provide spot elevations in existing eastern parking lot/PAAL to show that proposed parking will match existing grades in the existing parking lot/PAAL. For instance, grade break elevation 5.99 appears high. b) Spot elevations shown on the plan sheets indicate flow into east parcel parking area, while flow arrows indicate otherwise. For instance, grade break spot elevation 5.99 is lower than 6.00 for inlet. Revise grading spot elevations in parking area to reflect flow toward basin, on all plan views. 3) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.F: List the datum used on first sheet as a general grading note. Submit revised Grading Plan (3 copies) with a copy of the approved Development Plan. If you have questions, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 04/20/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Applicant came in and made revisions to Grading Plan sheets at the counter for Engineering approval. -EE |
| 04/21/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved development plan including landscape and NPP plans to continue review. |
| 04/23/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 04/23/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan or development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |