Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU00686
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site/Grading Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. D.S. 2-05.2.1.C Correct and revise Sheet 2. 3. Indicate contour intervals along with north arrow and scale. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 4. Indicate all existing buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E 5. Indicate existing sight visibility triangles on the upper northeast corner of the site. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 6. If applicable, indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 7. Delineate limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation. Indicate WSE and Flood limit symbols in Legend. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.15 8. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17 9. Dimensioned right-of-way on Miller Avenue on Sheet 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 10. If applicable, indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines for Gardner Lane and Miller Ave.\. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 12. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. Refer to comment #3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23 Indicate graphically contour elevations mid through contour lines to determine FFE for proposed structures. 13. Indicate refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned. Dimension refuse enclosure detail. 14. A Floodplain Use Permit required. 15. Indicate adjacent Zones. 16. Sheet 1; remove SVT dimensions. 17. Sheet 2; reposition text above leader extension. 18. Indicate a dimensioned detail of Detention/Retention Basin. 19. Differential Grading-Section 13.1 This criteria applies to all non-residential developments, and all residential developments with lots that are less than 24,000 square feet, that are adjacent to an existing residential development or residentially zoned property (excepting multifamily developments greater than single story), or un-subdivided non-commercial property. |
| 04/16/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 18, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU00686 PROJECT NAME: Windmill Business Park PROJECT ADDRESS: 2075 West Gardener Lane PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. 1. Please submit three copies of the grading plan and the SWPPP with the second submittal. SWPPP is approvable however the grading plan must be approved prior to SWPPP approval. |
| 04/18/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning Review Section may not review or approve the grading plan until the site plan has been approved by all sections. |
| 04/20/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |