Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

The login landing page when selecting 'View' is still occurring and is still pending further investigation. 

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05BU00673
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T05BU00673
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/11/2005 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: April 13, 2005
TO: Derek Roberts, Arcadis
SUBJECT: Limberlost Townhouses, Grading Plan Review
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU00673

SUMMARY: The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time.
Grading Plan comments:
1. Include a copy of the stamped approved tentative plat with the resubmittal. The grading permit cannot be approved until the tentative plat has been approved.
2. As indicated in various comments during the tentative plat review, a floodplain use permit is required before the grading permit can be approved. Submit a complete floodplain use permit application along with the $50 permit fee and a $150 hydrology report review fee as required by the floodplain ordinance.
3. Clearly indicate the limits of grading on the grading plan.
4. Show details for the outlet weir, low flow pipe, and maintenance access for the basin as described in the drainage report and the tentative plat.
5. Revise General Note 1 to indicate that the 2003 Standard Specifications will be followed.
6. Various callouts for details refer to the incorrect page or to non-existent details. Revise the plans as necessary to provide correct references.
7. Provide general dimensions and cross-sections for the basin. Revise the label for the channel so that it is consistent with the tentative plat.
8. Revise the pad elevations for lots 34 through 39 so that the lowest floor elevations will be at least one foot above the water surface elevation in the channel.
9. Revise detail S/5 to clearly indicate that the top of the proposed v-ditch will be at least 2 feet from the project boundary.
10. Clarify the channel configuration at the north end of the channel. The channel bottom flow line shows lower elevations than the proposed contours adjacent to lot 37.
11. Provide clear construction details for the outlet from the channel into Limberlost Drive.
12. Provide proposed elevations for the top of the channel to show that adequate freeboard is provided. If the channel does not provide the freeboard indicated in the tentative plat comments posted by Matt Flick on December 16, 2004, indicate that the adjacent walls will be built as floodwalls as described in the comments.
13. Revise the detail for the west project boundary to clarify that proposed grading complies with the differential grading provision of the development standard.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan comments:
14. The SWPPPs that were submitted for review do not include the required site map. Include a site map in the SWPPP that meets the requirements of the general permit.
15. The SWPPP must include a copy of the Notice of Intent that was submitted to ADEQ.
16. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map.
17. Part IV.D.8.c Provide a written procedure that will be used to ensure that surplus concrete and drum washout will not become a pollutant elsewhere if it is not washed out on site. Otherwise, provide a location and procedure for washing out concrete trucks on site.
18. Part IV.D.6. Describe post-construction stormwater management measures
19. Part IV.D.7 Describe how all non-stormwater discharges will be eliminated or reduced to the extent feasible
20. Part IV.D.7 Describe how BMPs will be implemented for non-stormwater discharges.
21. Part IV.C.4 Indicate the name of the nearest receiving water.
Revise the Grading Plan and prepare a SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and three copies of the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov.

Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
04/18/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit stamped approved tentative plat to continue review.
04/23/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/26/2005 BETH GRANT OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
04/26/2005 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed