Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU00480
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 05/09/2005 The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan does not meet the minimum standards of the AzPDES Construction General Permit. 1. Part IV.C.2.b. Part IV.D.1. Part IV.D.2.a. Significant construction work is proposed for the drainageway through this project. Clearly describe the scheduling and other practices that will be followed to minimize erosion of the channel and banks while this construction is underway. Include these activities in the sequence of major activities. Describe the steps that will be taken when erosion occurs to prevent the sediment from migrating off site. Describe the steps that will be taken to clean up sediments that do accumulate off site. 2. Part IV.H.1. Describe the correct inspection schedule as required by the general permit. Inspections must be made every two weeks AND within 24 hours of a rain of a half inch or more, during the normally wet seasons of the year. During the dry seasons of the year, inspections must occur at least once a month, whenever rain is predicted AND within 24 hours after a rain of one half inch or more. Include in the next submittal 3 copies of the SWPPP for the approval stamp. |
| 05/20/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 05/20/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan or development plan. Please submit copies of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat and Landscape and NPPO. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 05/25/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved tentative plat including landscape and NPP plans to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/31/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |