Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU00351
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning may not approve the grading plan until the site plan has been approved by all sections and the grading plan has been approved by the Engineering Section. |
| 05/17/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Drainage Report, Site & Grading review DATE: 17 May2005 ACTIVITY NUMBERS T05CM00691/T05BU00351 T15S, R14E, Section 7 Engineering Division has reviewed the resubmittal package Subject items. Previous comments have not been fully addressed, and approvals may not be recommended at this time. Please submit revised site and grading plans and a addressing all comments provided below. Include Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) and associated text/documents with the resubmittal, and a response letter addressing in detail where necessary, responses to all of the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT: (Previous comment) "If retention is proposed in a resubmittal, provide a copy of the soils report. A soils report is required to be submitted in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The report shall contain at a minimum, technical information on soil classification, erodibility, permeability, slope stability, groundwater elevation, infiltration rates, recommended minimum building setbacks (from basins and drainageways), whether or not hydro-collapsing soils are present, and contain the results of a minimum 30 foot deep soil boring. Provide discussion/analysis in the drainage report as necessary, demonstrating conformance to retention basin design and performance criteria (DS 10-01.0, Section 3.5.1.5)." Please provide a Soils Report as requested. The basin adjacent to the proposed building without an acceptable building setback is not acceptable. This issue must be promptly and thoroughly addressed. SITE PLAN: 1. (Previous comment) "Label the detention basin 100-year water surface elevation/limit of ponding (DS 2-02.2.1 A 15)". 2. Previous comment, "Depict and label curb returns and curb access ramps (PC/COT SD 207) at the Weiding Rd. driveway locations, and concrete headers (PC/COT SD 213) at the Rens road intersection (DS 3-01.3.2 C & 3-05.2.1 C 3 a)" has not been adequately addressed. Specify the Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail Number (206) in Keynote 9, and revise the plan to indicate the proposed driveway aprons, rather than the curb returns depicted. 3. Omit Keynotes 38 and 39, or revise as appropriate. 4. Provide detail 9/SD1, or omit this call-out adjacent to the detention/retention basin. 5. The existing power pole in the Weiding Rd. right of way was not noted on the initial review, and Keynote 28 does not appear to have been used on plan view. The site plan must address the conflict with the existing power pole and the proposed western ingress/egress (driveway apron). Please address this matter and add a note for relocation of the power pole, with the proposed new location depicted and labeled, and omit Keynote 28. 6. (Previous comment) "The proposed refuse container location is not accessible as depicted. Revise as necessary, and depict maneuverability/access to the dumpster, assuring 36' inside and 50' outside turning radii are provided. Refer to Development Standard 6-01.0 for additional solid waste provision requirements (DS 2-02.2.1 A 32)." 7. A recorded easement must be created for proposed access to the dumpster from the adjacent property. Include recording information on the plan (Dkt/Pg) and submit 2 copies of the proposed easement with legal descriptions and supporting exhibits. Please note however, that the dumpster is NOT accessible as depicted (conflict with adjacent, offsite dumpster enclosure). 8. Revise the sheet number identified within the call-outs to the enclosure details (to 2/SD2 & 5/SD2). 9. Previous comment # 6, "Depict scuppers where any site drainage may be concentrated, for conveyance of 10-year flows (min) under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.5.1 E & DS 3-01.4.4 F)", does apply to this project. "Sidewalk areas" include pedestrian access and refuge areas (Keynote 23). Please depict and label scuppers at roof downspout locations to address this requirement. GRADING PLAN: The grading plan must indicate all revisions that occur as a result of drainage report and site plan comments provided for this project. Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and drainage report prior to resubmittal, and address all comments listed below on a revised grading plan. 1. The basin maintenance access ramp is not apparent on the revised plan. Please identify the ramp location, width, slope, and dimensions 2. Clarify and revise the basin bottom width dimensions in sections C/2 and B/2 for consistency with the drainage report and plan view. Resubmittal will require revised Site and Grading, and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) and associated text/documents addressing all items listed above, at a minimum. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, ext. 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov Douglas Williams Sr. Eng. Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 05/18/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2005 | DHERRON1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/20/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |