Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04OT02056
Parcel: 140260080

Address:
6202 S SEARS BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04OT02056
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/13/2004 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/15/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Additional trees are required within the vehicular use area, 1 canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces. Every parking space shall be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree, as measured from the center of the tree trunk per LUC 3.7.2.3 Ord. No. 10016, §1, 8/2/04.

2. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation.

3. Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0
10/18/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0
11/02/2004 Peter McLaughlin ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: John D. Waid
4001 N. Runway Drive Tucson, AZ 85705
(520) 408-9052


FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.

PROJECT:
T04OT02056
New Spain Development
New Industrial Shell Buildings
6202 S. Sears Blvd.
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: November 4, 2004


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed as a new use. Full code compliance is required.
DS 2-02

2. The number of both standard and handicap vehicle parking spaces shown on the drawing is more than is indicated as being provided in the parking calculations. Revise to be consistent. For the number of vehicle spaces shown, 4 handicapped spaces are required. Revise calcs. Also, the number of bicycle parking spaces shown on the drawing is not consistent with the bicycle parking calcs. Revise for consistency. Revise bicycle parking calculation to be based on 8 percent of the actual vehicle parking provided (90% class 1, 10% class 2). Based on the number of vehicle spaces shown, 8 bicycle parking spaces are required (7 class 1 and 1 class 2).
DS 2-02.2.2.A.4

3. Specify the type of industrial use proposed in the notes and calculations and add the restrictions that the particular use is subject to per LUC Sec. 2.7.1.2. For example, if the use is general manufacturing, add a note stating that this use is subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.5.1.B, .D, .E, .F, and .H.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

4. Add the existing use of the site (i.e. vacant) to the notes.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

5. According to the Assessors Office the subject property is made up of four lots. These lots must be combined with a recorded covenant which can be obtained from the zoning review counter. Please provide documentation of lot combination.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

6. Add the address of the site to the plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.3

7. Label the width and purpose and add the recordation information (docket and page) for the utility easement that runs along the existing property line between lots 4 & 5. Show the location, dimensions and purpose of any existing easements on the drawing and provide recordation.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

8. Revise street perimeter yard building setbacks to be correct on the drawing. Developing area setback along Sears Blvd is required to be the greater of 21 feet or height of exterior building wall measured from edge of nearest travel lane. The MS&R setback along Campbell Ave. is required to be the greater of 21 feet or height of exterior building wall measured from back of future curb location. Label existing and future curbs on the plan and dimension from street monument lines the distance to existing and future curbs.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.19
DS 2-02.2.1.A.7

9. Revise all required and provided setbacks to be correct under the zoning information table. Revise the required street front building setback to read "the greater of 21 feet or the height of exterior structure wall". Revise provided street front bldg. setback to correctly reflect the dimensions on the drawing. The required bldg setback to adjacent R-2 zoned property to the south is 1-½ times the height of bldg wall. Based on the 13 foot building height proposed, a 19½- foot bldg. setback is required. Revise drawing to demonstrate compliance. In the setback table revise the side perimeter yard bldg. setback provided to read 1 foot to the east perimeter lot line and 59 feet to the west perimeter lot line as shown on the drawing.
LUC 3.2.6.5
LUC 3.2.6.4
DS 2-02.2.1.A.7

10. Continuous pedestian circulation must connect all buildings. Dimensioned the pedestrian sidewalks on the plan. DS 2-08.4.1
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

11. Keynote 4 and 5 have been reversed on the plan. Revise keynotes to point to the correct object.

12. Place a note on the plan stating that the project is designed to meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, MS&R setback zone. LUC 2.8.3

13. Trash dumpsters and loading zones may not be located in the PAAL. Revise location so they do not conflict with access to parking areas.

14. Between any building and PAAL a minimum 5' refuge area including a 4-foot sidewalk is required. Show the required pedestrian refuge area adjacent to the west sides of buildings 2 & 3 and along the east, south and north sides of building 1. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1

15. Concrete wheel stop curbs must be placed 2-½ feet in front of curbs, fences or other obstructions to allow room for vehicle overhang. Dimension the 2-½ foot dimension for wheel stops on the parking detail. DS 3-05.2.3.C

16. The class 2 bicycle parking must be separated from vehicle use area by vertical concrete curbs or other barriers. Revise to show the separation on the plan drawing. DS 2-09

17. The site is within the Airport Environs Zone's Airport Hazard District for Tucson International Airport. Add a note to indicate that the elevation above median sea level (MSL) of the NE end of runway 21 at T.I.A. is 2,567 feet. Along with building height proposed add the elevation above mean sea level of the site and add a note stating that this site plan complies with the Airport Environs Zone AHD. LUC 2.8.5.7.A.1.c
LUC 2.8.5.6.A

18. Zoning history maps indicate that this site is part of a rezoning. Place the rezoning case number (C9-82-64) in the lower right hand corner of the drawing and list all conditions of approval as a note. Demonstrate compliance, either graphically or by general notes, with all rezoning conditions on the plan. If required by the rezoning conditions, a development plan must be submitted for review. Further comments may be necessary if a development plan is a required as a condition of rezoning.

19. Show the location, size and height of any proposed freestanding signage. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site. DS 2-02.2.1.13

20. Indicate the location of any proposed freestanding lighting on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
11/04/2004 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning review comments.
11/09/2004 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Drainage Report and Site review
DATE: 08 November 2004
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04OT02054-2056
T15S, R14E, Section 8

Engineering Division has reviewed the Subject items. Approvals are not recommended at this time. Please provide a revised drainage report and site plan. Include a response letter addressing all of the following comments:

DRAINAGE REPORT:
The drainage report text must specify that the proposed drainage plan conforms to the approved drainage report for New Spain Industrial Park, Lots 1-32 as currently presented. Please assure any specific development requirements contained in the approved report that may apply to this project are discussed and appropriately addressed in a revised report. Please address the following comments prior to resubmittal:
1. Provide a copy of the site plan in the report, as stated on page1. Depict and label on the site plan the 100-year floodplain limits and any areas of sheet flooding resulting from 100-year flood peaks of 100-cfs or greater. Include spot- or water surface elevations, ground contours, and clearly label any regulatory floodplain as such on the exhibit (Development Standard - DS 10-02.0, Sections 2.3.1.4 C 1, 3, 6 and 5.2.2 & 5.2.5).
2. Include the size location and type of inflow and outflow structures to be employed, with dimensions of critical portions of those structures (DS 10-02.0, Section 2.3.1.6 A 4 a).
3. Depict the location and size of (a) maintenance access ramp(s) for the basin (DS 10-02.0, Section 2.3.1.6 A 4 b).
4. A soils report is required to be submitted in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The report shall contain at a minimum technical information on soil classification, erodibility, permeability, slope stability, groundwater elevation, infiltration rates, recommended minimum building setbacks (from basins and drainageways), whether or not hydro-collapsing soils are present, and contain the results of a minimum 30-foot deep soil boring (Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual - DS 10-01 - Section 3.5.1.5).
5. Provide retention basin percolation test results in the revised drainage report. Include discussion/analysis of the test results to assure the maximum allowed time of disposal will not be exceeded for the proposed basin (DS 10-01.0, Sec. 3.5.1).
SITE PLAN:
1. Provide a bearing in the basis of bearing referenced for this project (DS 2-02.2.1 A 5).
2. Revise/correct the Campbell Avenue future sight visibility triangles. The future curb location must first be depicted, as future sight visibility triangles are based upon the face of future curb - 12' west of the existing right of way/property line in this instance. See redlines on sheet X-1 (DS 2-02.. 2.1 A 10).
3. Depict and label the limits of the 100-year floodplain with water surface elevations provided (DS 2-02.2.1.15).
4. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1 A 17).
5. Include "& drainage easement" in the labeling of the 30' shared access easement on the northern perimeter of the site (DS 2-02.2.1 A 20).
6. Provide 18' minimum unobstructed radii at all locations onsite where a Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) intersects another PAAL, where emergency and solid waste vehicles must maneuver. Please assure any required pedestrian refuge areas are depicted and do not conflict with maneuverability areas (DS 3-05.2.1 C 3 a).
7. Provide a typical dumpster enclosure detail. The detail should specify a minimum 5" thick concrete slab, with bollards to be placed on the rear and side walls of an enclosure. Assure a minimum of 10 feet between sidewall bollards is clearly dimensioned (DS 6-01.4.0).
8. Depict roof drainage direction(s) and downspout locations with sidewalk scuppers depicted and labeled where necessary, demonstrating roof drainage flow conveyance under all sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E & 2-08.5.1 E).
9. Depict, label and dimension basin maintenance access ramps on the site and grading plans (ref. drainage report comment # 3).

GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. A grading permit will be required for this project. Please complete a grading permit application and submit with 3 sets of Grading and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) with text.
2. The grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval.
3. The SWPPP text must contain project-specific discussion addressing all necessary items for conformance with stormwater pollution prevention requirements. The "Construction SWPPP Checklist" may serve as a useful guideline for SWPPP preparation - available at the following link: http://www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf.
4. Ensure a copy of the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) General Permit is included in the text and that each submittal contains a signed copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) as submitted to Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). The SWPPP should be consistent with the site and grading plans and drainage report. For additional information regarding SWPPP content specifications, go to: http://www.azdeq.gov/function/forms/appswater.html
5. Subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions on revised plans.
Resubmittal will require a revised Drainage Report and Site plan.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 ext.1189, or by email at Doug.Williams@tucsonaz.gov

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
City of Tucson

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/10/2004 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/10/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed