Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T04OT01917
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/01/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/02/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Add note to landscape plan: All plants designated to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A |
| 12/02/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Plans shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that they will conform to the provisions of this code and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations per DS 11-01.4.1.C. Indicate on the landscape plan the edge of existing vegetation. 2. Add note to landscape plan: All plants designated to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A |
| 12/20/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 22, 2004 TO: Stephen Magelli, OPW Engineering, LLC SUBJECT: Commercial Parking Lot, Site Plan and Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04OT01917, T04OT02298 and T04BU02354 SUMMARY: The Site Plan, Grading Plan and Drainage Report were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Site Plan, Grading Plan, Drainage Report and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time. Drainage Report comments: 1. As previously commented, the proposed future drainage conditions appear to shift the overbank discharge from Aragon Road to Plumer Avenue. Provide discussion and calculations to show that properties along Plumer Avenue will not be adversely impacted by the changed drainage patterns. Site and Grading Plan comments: 2. Clarify by showing spot elevations or specific cross sections that flood depths in the parking areas will not exceed one foot in depth. Please note the signage requirement for parking lots subject to flooding. Refer to Section 12.3.3 on page 12.03 of the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson Arizona. Floodplain Use Permit Comments: 3. The floodplain use permit will be approved and issued with the site and grading permits. Revise the Site Plan, Grading Plan, Drainage Report and the SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and the SWPPP. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/29/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/29/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |