Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T04OT01911
Parcel: 11104218A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04OT01911
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/24/2004 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/29/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Include the height of 8" CMU wall DS 2-07.2.2.3.b

2. Provide a 30" continuous screen for parking lot along Ft. Lowell Rd. per LUC Table 3.7.2-1

3. Within the vehicle use area planters a minimum of 34 square feet and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for canopy trees per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.c. See NPPO comments.

4. Provide north arrow and scale on landscape plan per DS 2-02.2.1.2

5. Ficus pumila is not included in the LOW WATER USE/DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT LIST 9-06.7 EXHIBIT II, Provide oasis calculations per DS 2-06.3.2 or choose appropriate plant material.
09/29/2004 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Site Plan
1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal.

2. Indicate contour intervals along with the north arrow, and scale. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1

3. Indicate all buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E

4. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles. The distance length for the Near SVT is 345'. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Correct and revise.

5. Indicate drainage patterns with a flow arrow, proposed finish floor elevation. Note this on Site Plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16

6. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities on Site Plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17

7. Indicate if street is Public or Private. Show adjacent driveways. Show existing road medians. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18

8. If applicable, indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. Indicate street centerline. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

10. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23
09/30/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied All plants designated by the approved Native Plant Preservation Plan to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A. #5 Mesquite on the Native Plant Survey L.1.1 can not be counted as PIP if it does not comply with Development Standards.
10/22/2004 Peter McLaughlin ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Just Build LLC
178 E. Broadway Blvd
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 792-9544

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Development Services Dept.
(520) 792-9544

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.

PROJECT:
T04OT01911
Illuminations/Carol Lighting
3525 E Fort Lowell (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: October 22, 2004

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project is a new building and was reviewed for full code compliance.
DS 2-02

2. Dimension the width of the proposed sidewalk between the proposed building and the existing sidewalk along Ft. Lowell Rd. A minimum 4-foot sidewalk is required.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

3. The loading zone calculations state that only one loading zone is provided but two are shown on the plan. Revise drawing or calculations. DS 2-02.2.2.A.5

4. Wheelstop curbing is required in parking spaces where parked vehicles may overhang the area where garbage trucks will be accessing the dumpster enclosure.nlandscaped areas, walls, etc. Show the required wheelstops in these parking spaces curbing in the vehicle spaces along the west side of the parking lot where vehicles may strike the 30" screen wall or the freestanding site lighting.
DS 3-05.2.3.C.1

5. Provide the actual height of the building in the Code Review Data by specifying the maximum building height above design grade elevation along each building wall. MS&R setbacks are based on he greater of 21 feet or the height of exterior structure wall measured from back of future curb location. Dimension this setback from back of future curb on the drawing to show compliance.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.6
LUC 3.2.6.5

6. Per the proposed use of furniture sales in the C-3 zone, revise the development designator to read "34" in the Code Review Data. LUC 2.5.5.2.B.3

7. Any use providing fewer than 50 vehicle parking spaces may substitute class 2 spaces for class 1 spaces. Revise class 2 bicycle detail to read "…per Dev Standards DS 2-09. LUC 3.3.7.8
DS 2-09.6
DS2-09.5.1

8. Indicate the dimensions and height of the proposed monument sign. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13

9. In addition to the maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR), provide a proposed (FAR) calculation to the plan. The FAR is calculated as the building gross floor area ÷ site area. Also, the maximum allowed FAR per development designator 34 is 2.00, not 0.90 as stated. Please revise calculation. DS 2-02.2.2.A

10. If free-standing outdoor lighting is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

11. Add a general note stating that the project meets the criteria for LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone.

12. A portion of the proposed sloped CMU wall is located within the future sight visibility triangle. Within the SVT no portion of the wall may be over 30" in height above the at-grade centerline of the adjacent PAAL. The plan must be revised or approval of a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) is required. If a DSMR is sought and approved, add the case number, date of approval and conditions on the site plan. DS 3-01.5.1.A


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
10/22/2004 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/26/2004 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/26/2004 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed