Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T04OT01512
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2004 | Patricia Gilbert | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 15, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04OT01512 PROJECT NAME: Navajo North PROJECT ADDRESS: 104 West Navajo Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT IS DENIED RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT, FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT APPLICATION 1. Show the 100-year peak water surface elevation (WSEL) on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. The above comment was from the first submittal. The WSEL shown on the site and the grading plan is from the drainage report which uses the datum NGVD 1929. On sheet 1 of the site site/grading plan is shows the basis of elevation being used is NAVD 1988. All elevations must have the same datum. Revise as necessary. 2. The datum used on the site plan and drainage report do not match. The site plan states under the basis of elevation, NAVD 1988 was used. The drainage report used NGVD 1929, which results in an approximate difference of 2.3' in elevations. On sheet 2 the finish floor elevations appear to be in NGVD 1929. This is too confusing. The datum on the drainage report and the site plan must match. Revise the site plan and/or the drainage report to be consistent. This must be addressed prior to floodplain use permit approval. DS 2-02.2.1.23. The above comment has not been addressed. The site, grading and drainage report must use the same datum. Revise the necessary documents to show the same datum used on all elevations. |