Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04OT01511
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a 5' wall to screen the vehicle use areas from adjacent residential properties to the east and west per LUC Table 3.7.2-1 2. Landscaping within parking lots where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. Provide protection for trees located in vehicle use area. 3. Revise keynote #2 on the site plan to indicate the correct height of CMU wall per DS 2-07.2.2.3.b 4. Provide the correct mitigation for Prosopis velutina according to preservation table. Revise preservation plan to coincide with plant preservation totals. Zizyphus obtusifolia is indicate in the totals per DS 2-15.0 |
| 07/30/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the correct mitigation for Prosopis velutina according to preservation table. Revise preservation plan to coincide with plant preservation totals. Zizyphus obtusifolia is indicate in the totals per DS 2-15.0 |
| 08/02/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | An approved fire apparatus access roadway must be provided and extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the the exterior walls of all buildings. Alleys are not considered as access. An approved turnaround must be provided for dead-end access roadways. |
| 08/19/2004 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 12, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04OT01511 PROJECT NAME: Navajo North PROJECT ADDRESS: 104 West Navajo PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-08.4.1.E 2. It is acknowledged that under the drainage notes reference to the project being in a floodplain. However the note states the project is in an "A" zone where base flood elevations are not determined. The project is in an "AE" Zone, where base flood elevations are determined. Revise Drainage Note number 1 to state the subject lots are in an "AE" zone. 3. This project is subject to the requirements of the City of Tucson Code, Chapter 26. Floodplain and Erosion Hazard. A completed elevation certificate by a state-registered land surveyor is required to be returned to Development Services, Engineering Section prior to final inspection and a certificate of occupancy is issued. Please note that any mechanical equipment; water heaters, air conditioning systems, coolers, etc, must be elevated one foot above the water surface elevation and certified on the same elevation certificate for the structure. This project will have four elevation certificates given that the project has four structures. 4. Show the 100-year peak water surface elevations (WSEL) on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. 5. The datum used on the site plan and drainage report do not match. The site plan states under the basis of elevation NAVD 1988 was used. The drainage report used NGVD 1929, which results in an approximate difference of 2.3' in elevations. On sheet 2 the finish floor elevations appear to be in NGVD 1929. The datum on the drainage report and the site plan must match. Revise the site plan and/or the drainage report to be consistent. DS 2-02.2.1.23. 6. On the site plan, sheet 1, cut and fill quantities are listed. Fill quantities are 500 cubic feet. Is this correct? Typically cut and fill quantities are in cubic yards. Revise to show estimated cut and fill quantities in cubic yards. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 7. Add a note to the plan all finish grade elevations, drainage patterns can be found on the grading plan, sheet 3. DS 2-02.1.A.16. 8. It is acknowledged that there is a symbol in the legend for "water flow direction mark." However the direction of flow is not indicated on the site plan. Indicate direction of flow on the site plan with the symbol shown in the legend. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16 9. Show roof drainage arrows on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16 10. Show on keynote 31 the dimensions of the sight visibility triangle. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 11. Does Navajo Street have curbs? If there are curbs indicate on the site plan curbs along Navajo Street. Show dimensions from street centerline to existing and/or proposed curbs, sidewalks and driveways. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 12. The basis of elevation is required to include the City Field Book and page number. Give the City Field Book and page number. DS 2-02.2.1.23. 13. An adequate and safe ingress/egress is required for the collection vehicle in each new project. Each service area is required to have a clear approach of fourteen feet by forty feet for the collection vehicle. Access to the current location of the solid waste enclosure entails the collection vehicle to back up into parking spaces. This is not acceptable. The maximum back up distance for a solid waste vehicle is 40'. Revise the plan to meet the requirements of Development Standard 6-01. Contact John Clark, 791-3175, ext. 1136 for assistance with the solid waste location. Proposals not meeting the requirements of DS 6-01 requires a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) to be processed. For information regarding the DSMR process please contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5550, extension 1179. DS 6-01.3.1.A., DS 6-01.4.1.J. 14. A minimum distance of three feet will be provided between the back up spur and wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches in height. The back up spur located on the west side of the PAAL only has two feet between the required 5' wall (see landscape comment number one) the curb. Revise the site plan to show three feet between the wall and the back of the spur. DS 3-05.2.2.D. 15. Stormwater must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under natural or existing conditions. Because a CMU wall is required for the vehicle use area how will the wall not block the existing direction of flow and not increase the 100-year peak water surface elevation more than a tenth of a foot. Whenever walls are constructed, they must have adequate flow-through openings for accepting and releasing drainage without elevating or ponding water on the upstream side and impacting the adjacent property. Revise the plan to show the wall. Give wall opening dimensions, quantity and location. SMDDFM 12.5 16. It appears that curb is indicated as a barrier for the vehicle use area and the curb returns however there is not a keynote depicting curb. For plan clarity add a keynote to depict where curb is located within the vehicle use area and for the curb returns. 17. Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from vehicular use areas by means of grade separation, curbs, barriers, railing etc. Revise as necessary. DS 2-08.4.1. 18. Align driveway access to existing driveway across the street. Closed unused driveways. Show adjacent driveways. Chapter 25. 19. In areas where fill is to be used to raise the elevation of the building site, the building line shall be located not less than twenty-five (25) feet landward from any edge of the fill, unless a study prepared by a state-registered professional civil engineer and approved by the city engineer shows that a lesser distance is acceptable. Tucson Code Chapter 26-8.d.2 20. Development in the floodway fringe shall be constructed so as to protect placed fill from erosion which could be caused by waters, or otherwise. Such fill shall be permitted only when demonstrated by the owner/developer that it will have some beneficial purpose, as determined by the city engineer, and the amount of proposed fill is not in excess of what is necessary to achieve that purpose. The fill shall be protected from erosion which could be accomplished by placing riprap, vegetative cover, bulk heading, or any other city engineer approved methods. Revise the site plan to show protective measures for the fill. Tucson Code Chapter 26-5.2.12 21. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 22. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to a ten year event. The sidewalks proposed on the plan connecting the building are blocking the flow. Show sidewalk scuppers where appropriate. Drainage must be routed under all the sidewalks including the one adjacent to the PAAL. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The datum used in the drainage report and the site plan are different, resulting in a 2.3' difference in elevation. The datum used on the site plan must match what is used in the drainage report or the correct conversion must occur on the site plan for the correct finish floor elevation. Revise as necessary. 2. The site plan is required to have a screen wall adjacent to the vehicle use area along the property line (see landscape's comment number one). Page three of the drainage report states that screen walls are not proposed. Unless a variance is requested and approved a screen wall is required to screen the VUA from the residentially zoned parcels. Revise the drainage report to address the required walls. Size the wall opening if appropriate. 3. The datum used on the site plan and drainage report do not match. The site plan states under the basis of elevation NAVD 1988 was used. The drainage report used NGVD 1929, which results in an approximate difference of 2.3' in elevations. On sheet 2 the finish floor elevations appear to be in NGVD 1929. The datum on the drainage report and the site plan must match. Revise the site plan and/or the drainage report to be consistent. DS 2-02.2.1.23. 4. The drainage report refers to figure 5 (proposed conditions). Figure 5 was not submitted with both submitted drainage reports. Submit figure 5. |
| 09/02/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04OT01511 Navajo North Apartments 104 N. Navajo Avenue Site Plan Transmittal date: 1st Review, September 7, 2004 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The proposed building setbacks from the interior property lines or from the street property line could not be verified because a building height or dimensioned building elevations were not included with the site plan packet. Please list the height of the overall height of the structure as measured from design grade to the tallest point of a gable roof or to the top of a parapet wall. Please demonstrate on the building footprints gable, parapet, or hip roof design or provide copies of the dimensioned elevation drawings with the next site plan submittal packet. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 2. Please label the distance between the buildings. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 3. Please revise the back-up spur along the west side of the parking lot. The back-up spur must be constructed as depicted in DS 3-05.2.2.D. A three-foot distance must be maintained between the back of the extruded curb and the fence. Wheel stops are to be placed two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space as measured from the front of the parking to the tire side of the wheel stop. The detail on sheet shows the wheel stop located and dimensioned from the midpoint of the stop. Please revise the detail as required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 4. This project is to be provided with a minimum of two class two bicycle parking spaces. See D.S. 2-09 for more information on the class two facility. The class two facilities must be drawn on the plan and labeled. A fully dimensioned detail drawing of the facility to be provided must be added to the plan. The detail drawing must be drawn based on the location on the site and must include the following information: the type of facility to be provided, the number of bicycles the facility supports, the type of surfacing, directional signage if the facility is not visible from the street, lighting, and must be fully dimensioned to accommodate the bicycles based on the requirements per D.S. 2-09. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 5. Label the width of the driveway entrance. The minimum width for two-way traffic is 24 feet. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 6. The pedestrian circulation must be provided to the bicycle parking facility. Please insure that the sidewalk to the facility connect to the onsite pedestrian circulation. The sidewalk must be a minimum of four feet wide and constructed of concrete. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 7. If applicable please indicate the location, type and size on existing or proposed signage including existing billboards. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 8. If applicable, all easements of records must be drawn and labeled on the plan. The location, purpose, width, and recordation information must be listed on the plan for each existing or proposed easement. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 9. If applicable please indicate the location, type, and height of any proposed freestanding lighting. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 10. See landscape reviewer comments regarding landscape border, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 11. Please revise the zoning classifications as noted on sheet 2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 12. Revise general note 3 to state the following. Family Dwelling DD "K", Multi-Family Residential Development, subject to LUC section 3.5.7.1.F. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 13. Include in general note 6, that the maximum lot coverage allowed for this development designator is 70 percent. Also list independently the coverage of the structures and the vehicular use area to verify total lot coverage. DS 2-02.2.2.A.3 14. Add a bicycle parking calculation that includes the number of bicycle parking spaces required and the number of spaces provided. The calculation must also include the type of facility provided (class II). DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 15. Add as separate notes the allowed and proposed building height and the density calculations. The allowed and actual density must be as number of units allowed and units proposed. (The number of units that are allowed in an R-2 zone for a development utilizing the development designator "K" is 15 units per acre.) DS 2-02.2.2.B If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents. |
| 09/07/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/08/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |