Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04OT01494
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/28/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Minimum 20 foot wide, paved, fire apparatus access roadway must be provided and extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of all structures. An approved turnaround is required for dead-end access roadways. 2. Fire lane signs required. 3. Fire hydrant is required. 4. Minimum set back from property lines is 3 feet. Units 17 and 19 may require relocation. |
| 07/28/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/28/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/17/2004 | Doug Williams | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Plans may be stamped upon approval by Fire and Zoning Review Section. Over the counter stmping/approval of the plans may be coordinated at such time. |
| 08/18/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD) 1. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of four (4) separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. A copy of the City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant is attached to the yellow site plan card. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2) 2. List the project address. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3) 3. Note the size and height of all buildings and structures. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 4. Mobile home number one (1) does not meet the street perimeter yard setback of 20 feet required by LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.1. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7) 5. Mobile homes 15, 16, 19, 20, and office 27 do not meet the minimum 10-foot perimeter yard setback required. 6. A minimum width of five (5) feet is required between all mobile homes and the edge of PAAL. Label and dimension setback. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12) 7. For clarity purposes, delete all mobile homes, which are to be relocated or removed from the site plan. The site plan shall show proposed site conditions only. 8. Number all mobile homes clearly and numerically. Per letter from Patricia Gehlen dated April 19, 2004, 27 mobile homes, two (2) site built homes, and one (1) office is allowed. 9. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 10. Vehicular access is required to units 11, 12, 15, 16, 19, 20, office 27, and both existing residences. 11. If a variance or LDO is applied for, please add a general note, which lists the following: case number, date of approval, variances granted, and conditions imposed. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.38) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/19/2004 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/20/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |