Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FLOODPLAIN
Permit Number - T04OT01493
Review Name: FLOODPLAIN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/12/2004 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 12, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04OT01493 PROJECT NAME: Four-Plex Addition PROJECT ADDRESS: 1509 East Hedrick Drive PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, HYDROLOGY REPORT 1. In areas where fill is to be used to raise the elevation of the building site, the building line shall be located not less than twenty-five (25) feet landward from any edge of the fill, unless a study prepared by a state-registered professional civil engineer and approved by the city engineer shows that a lesser distance is acceptable. This needs to be addressed on the site plan prior to the floodplain use permit being approved. Tucson Code Chapter 26-8.d.2 2. Development in the floodway fringe shall be constructed so as to protect placed fill from erosion which could be caused by waters, or otherwise. Such fill shall be permitted only when demonstrated by the owner/developer that it will have some beneficial purpose, as determined by the city engineer, and the amount of proposed fill is not in excess of what is necessary to achieve that purpose. The fill shall be protected from erosion which could be accomplished by placing riprap, vegetative cover, bulk heading, or any other city engineer approved methods. This needs to be addressed on the site plan prior to the floodplain use permit being approved. Tucson Code Chapter 26-5.2.12 3. To ensure the structure is elevated one foot above the water surface elevation the City of Tucson datum needs to be shown in the drainage report and on the site plan. The contours on the TDOT map site are 3' higher than what is shown on the plan, thus the structure is not properly elevated. There is a 2.3' difference between 1929 NGVD and 1988 NAVD. Show on the plan and in drainage report the datum that was used. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/17/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |