Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T04OT01125
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. As per John Clark's letter, he indicates that a 300-gallon plastic garbage container can be utilized due to insufficient land. This arrangement does not meet D.S. 6-01.3.0 thru D.S. 6-01.4.2 An agreement has been met and a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) D.S. 1-01.4.7 is required to be submitted. An application can be picked up at the Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) office located at Public Works Bldg. @ 201 N. Stone Ave., 1st floor. |
| 04/13/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit previous stamped and approved landscape to continue review. |
| 04/19/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Kevin Palmer -The Architecture Company 2625 N. Silverbell Road Site Plan Review (1st review) FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T04OT01127 Desert Institute for Healing Arts 140 E. 4th Street Tucson, AZ 85705 Site Plan Review (3rd review) TRANSMITTAL: April 19, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The parking calculations indicate that there is a deficit in parking for the proposed educational-instructional school use. A Board of Adjustment Variance is required for the parking deficit. State the variance case number, date of approval, what variances were approved for and conditions of approval on the site plan. In addition, provide a copy of the variance approval document to the Zoning Review Section upon resubmittal. LUC 3.3.4 DS 2-02.2.1.A.38 3. The calculations indicate that no loading zone is to be provided. A Board of Adjustment variance application must be approved. See comment 1 regarding BOA variance requirements. LUC 3.4.5.4 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |