Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04OT01064
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/28/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/15/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Welman Sperides Michelberg Architects 5675 N. Oracle Road Suite 3203 Tucson, AZ 85704 (520) 408-1044 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: PATRICIA GEHLEN Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T04OT01064 Fire Station No 21 8620 E. Tanque Verde Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: June 17, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project is being reviewed for full code compliance. DS 2-02 2. This site is within the 400 foot Scenic Corridor for Tanque Verde Road. A Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) must be submitted and approved prior to site plan approval. Include the SCZ case number, date of approval, approved colors (if applicable- see comment 3 below) and conditions in the general notes. The 30-foot scenic buffer adjacent to the MS&R right-of-way line is to be preserved and maintained in its natural state per LUC 2.8.2.4. Refer to LUC Chapter 2.8.2 for SCZ requirements. LUC 2.8.2 DS 2-02.2.1A.38 3. The minimum required lot size in the SR zone per development designator "6" is 144,000 square feet (3.3 acres). The subject parcel has been split and is only 89,984 square feet (2.07 acres). Provide copies of zoning approved lot split documents. A Board of Adjustment variance is required for the undersized lot. Place the variance case number, date of approval, variances approved and conditions on the plan. LUC 3.2.3.2.A DS 2-01.2.1.A.38 4. Dimension from street monument lines the distance to existing and future curbs and sidewalks. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21 5. Dimension the wheelstop curbs at 2-½ from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 6. Provide a calculation of proposed vehicle use area and revise proposed lot coverage to include vehicle use area per LUC 3.2.9.2.B. LUC 3.2.9.2.B 7. The building setback to the east property line is required to be 100 feet, with only 40 feet proposed. It is acknowledged that an administrative waiver is being sought for the required setback modification. Provide a copy of approval documents. LUC 3.2.6.4 8. State the existing use on the site plan (vacant). DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 9. Please specify if the eight inside parking spaces are for the fire vehicles. If so the parking spaces for the fire trucks do not count towards the required parking. It is acknowledged that an administrative waiver is being sought for the parking deficit. LUC 3.4.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 06/16/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Dinkar Gangwal DATE: June 14, 2004 Alpha Engineering 117 N. 6th Avenue SUBJECT: Fire Station No. 21, 8620 E. Tanque Verde Road Site plan T04OT01064 (First Review) T13S, R15E, Section 33 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Please show retention basins on the site plan. 4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 7. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 8. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 9. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 10. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 11. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 12. Please dimension all retention basins for clarity, construction and inspection purposes. 13. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. 14. It appears that the building pad is higher than the 2 feet allowed per the 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. Please adjust. 15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 16. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. It appears that there is a drainage way along the Eastside of the property. 17. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 18. Please move the extruding curb leading into the trash enclosure laterally. The curbs should be set back 7' from the centerline of the enclosure. This will give the "clear space" a total of 14' in width. Also the space between the bollards on the inside of the enclosure should be 10' min. per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Contact John Clark at Environmental Services @ 791-5543 for more information. 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 21. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 22. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. Hydrology Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the HR. 2. There seems to be some discrepancies in the Peak estimator data sheets. Please check or revise basin factors and re-calculate the Hydrologic Data sheets if necessary. For example the 100-year existing cfs for the 2.067 acres, using a basin factor of 0.45 is only 8.92 cfs. The correct bf should be 0.60. If the bf is 0.60 then the 100-year cfs comes out to 17.6 cfs. This is a significant change, please revise all data sheets with the correct factors. A further review will be necessary to determine the basin retention values with the new data sheets. 3. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 06/17/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/17/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Include a list of plants proposed for the seed mix. DS 9-06.4.2 Native, indigenous plants are required for the scenic route buffer area and portions of the adjacent right of way. 2) Revise the landscape plan to include only native plants in the 30' scenic route buffer area. DS 9-06.4.1 3) Revise the landscape plan as necessary to respond to comments on the native plant preservation plan. |
| 06/21/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Include the complete inventory on the native plant preservation plan ( #'s 158-179 are missing). DS 2-15.3.1.A.2 2) An aerial photo is required. Refer to DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 3) Revise the calculations on sheet L3.1, TOS mitigation would only be 11. In addition excess TOS would be subtracted from the mitigation total. See the NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION WORKSHEET in DS 2-15.0 for explanation. 4) Notes reference a waiver request to be approved by the City Manager and Development Services. The basis for the request is that space limitations do not allow the standards to be met. The Landscape Section recommendation is that the request be examined thoroughly and that additional trees be located in available space, while considering other relevant factors. Also the mitigation requirements are likely to be modified based on comment #3 above. A revised letter may be necessary. 5) Revise the NPP plan to include a clearly delineated limit of grading/disturbance. DS 2-15.3.4.A |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/23/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |