Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T04OT01039
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/28/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 29, 2005 TO: Richard Reigle, Reigle & Associates SUBJECT: Safeway Store 1684, Site Plan Review and Floodplain Use Permit Application Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04OT01039 and T04OT01040 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Floodplain Use Permit were reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on June 28, 2004. The Site Plan and Floodplain Use Permit were not approved at this time. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1. Provide the basis for bearing (Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.A.5)) The basis of bearing is required on the site plan as the site plan is used as a reference for any future development. The basis of bearing may be presented graphically. Since the basis of bearing on the grading plan is described as the west line of section 17, this may be labelled on the site plan as the basis of bearing. Include two found monuments on the line with complete descriptions. 2. The minimum font size for all lettering on the plan must be 12 point. This is for legibility when the plans are microfilmed. Revise the plan accordingly. 3. Revise note 17 to require the use of truncated domes on existing access ramps within the project boundary. Drainage Report Comments 4. The Drainage Report is accepted for site plan review purposes. Floodplain Use Permit Application 5. The Floodplain Use Permit will be issued in conjunction with the Grading Permit. Revise the Site Plan to address these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/08/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Within a vehicular use area, 1 canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 2. 50% vegetative coverage of the landscape area between the property line and the screen wall is required along Campbell Avenue and Broadway Boulevard. Provide additional coverage where the landscape border width may exceed 10'. 3. Show the location of loading zone on landscape plan per DS 2-07.0 4. Provide a 6' high masonry wall to screen loading zone within fuel station form adjacent streets per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Include the Height of all screening materials on landscape plan and reference point for measurement. |
| 08/02/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T04OT01034 1940 E. Broadway Boulevard Safeway Store and Convenience/Fueling Store Site Plan Transmittal date: 2nd Review August 1, 2005 The second submittal reflects several significant changes as a result of the first set of review comments. These changes will have to be reviewed for compliance. Additional comments will be made related to the new changes. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. It is quite possible that certain comments that are made on this review were not made on the previous submittal due to changes in the plan. 1. It is acknowledged that Safeway does not intend to pursue acquisition of the Broadway right-of-way as depicted on the site plan. Please remove from the site plan all references to and including the delineation of the proposed right-of-way acquisition area. Copies of the combo forms and the Assessor's parcel forms must be submitted for review with the next submittal. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this item based on the documents submitted for review and further response comments. For clarification purposes, will the corner lot (Fuel Lot) function as and independent use or is the fueling station an accessory use to the General Merchandise use (Safeway Store). A cross access agreement for vehicular and pedestrian use will be required. It is acknowledged that Safeway is pursuing the lot combo for the fuel lots. Please resubmit a copy of the survey drawing that was submitted with the previous site plan. If a drawing (new record of Survey) for the combined parcels other than the revised site plan has been completed please submits a copy as reference. Previous Comment: It appears that a portion of the Broadway Boulevard right-of-way has been acquired or purchased. The plan does not provide information on the acquisition or the purchase of this area. It is also clear that several parcels have been purchased in order to develop the site as proposed. The Pima County Assessor's maps do not reflect the parcel configurations or lot dimensions as shown on the plan. Please add to the site plan the legal description of the property. If the parcels have not been combined (Tax Code Parcel Combo) this will be a requirement prior to approval of the site plan. In addition a Lot Combo Form required by the City Attorney's Office must be filled out by the owner or representative of the owner and recorded by the Pima County Recorder's Office. I have attached a copy of the combo form for your review and recordation. Copies of the recorded Pima County Assessor's Tax Code Combo Form and City Of Tucson Lot Combo Form must be submitted with the next site plan submittal. The site boundary dimensions as depicted on the site plan does not completely match the survey drawing which was attached with the site plan submittal packet. Please revise the site plan or a new survey may be required. Also, documentation from the City of Tucson Real Estate Division stating that the Broadway Boulevard right-of-way has been acquired and is now private property, must be submitted with the next site plan submittal. I made a site inspection on June 11, 2004 for verification of certain items that were brought to my attention regarding the new bus stop location and bus lane or bus pull out along the northeast property line (Broadway Boulevard). This bus pull out or the facility has not been depicted on the site plan and it is not clear how the site is affected. Based on the submitted site plan, I cannot be sure if the bus pull out allows for the additional parking spaces along the north property line as depicted on the plan. Draw the bus pull out, the bus stop facility and depict the right-of-way correctly. Submit supporting documentation such as drawings for the Broadway Boulevard with the bus pull out and right-of-way depicted, and documentation from the Real Estate Division related to the Broadway Boulevard acquisition. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the site boundary, right-of-way, bus pull out, lot combo etc on subsequent site plan submittals. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Please submit copies of the revised and recorded legal descriptions for both the Safeway and the Fueling parcels. Previous Comment: Revise the site boundary distances and bearings based on the revised property boundary. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 3. In reviewing the parking calculations it was noted that the parking calculation for the Safeway Store is listed as 277 parking space provided. Per the plan the actual number of parking spaces provided is 276. Revise the parking calculation. Also the number of required Handi-capped parking spaces required for the Safeway store is 7 which includes one van accessible parking with an eight-foot access aisle. Per the plan and the H.C. parking calculation eight H.C. spaces have been provided. The H.C. parking calculation must be revised for consistency with the 2003 IBC code standard, section 1106, and table 1106.1. The table lists seven H.C. spaces required when providing between 201 to 300 parking spaces. Revise the H.C. parking calculation for both the Safeway and "C" stores. The required number of H.C. parking spaces for the "C" store is based on 1 H.C. space when providing between 1 to 25 parking spaces. Previous Comment: Revision of the vehicle parking calculations for the fueling station may be required based on the response to the following comment. Clarify if the C. Store is strictly a kiosk for the employee to take payments for the fuel purchases or if retail sale of merchandise will also occur. If the kiosk for collection of fuel purchase payments only the parking calculation may be remain as listed. If the sale of general merchandise will occur the vehicle parking calculation must be revised to one spaces per two-hundred square feet of gross floor area. Of the spaces required either way one of the spaces must be a van handicapped space. In addition if the general merchandise sales will occur the bicycle parking calculation has to be revised to include two class-two bicycle-parking spaces required. The location of the facility must be show n on the plan and labeled. The facility must meet the requirements for location, surfacing, lighting, and type of facility. Revise the plan and calculation as required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 and DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 4. Per the revised site plan, the drive-through window has been relocated to the front of the store. The location of stacking spaces interferes with the pedestrian circulation/crosswalks. Please revise the plan to relocate the drive-through or revise the location of the required pedestrian sidewalk and crosswalks. It would be preferable that the drive-through window be relocated. The proposed location is not only a concern for the safety of the pedestrians but also for the drivers. (This is not an acceptable location for the drive-through.) Please keep in mind that all PAALs must be a minimum of 24 feet wide. The PAAL between the drive-through lane and the parking space islands does not appear to meet this requirement. Previous Comment: The previous plan did not indicate that a drive through was proposed. A drive through lane has been depicted on this plan. Please draw a symbol that represents an 8-foot by 18-foot stacking space. A drive-through lane must accommodate six stacking spaces. None of the stacking space may encroach onto a PAAL or impede the traffic using the PAAL. Please draw the six stacking spaces and insure that the spaces do not encroach onto the PAAL. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 5. The loading zone for the proposed "C" store is not allowed within a PAAL area as shown on the plan. Not only will it obstruct the vehicle from accessing the fuel pumps but diminishes the width of the PAAL area. The PAALs must be a minimum of 24 feet for two-way traffic. Please revise the plan to comply with the loading requirements. See LUS section 3.4 The "C" store is not large enough in square footage to require a loading zone but if it is provided the loading must be designed per the design guidelines in the Land Use Code section 3.4. The number of fuel pumps allowed in the C-1 zone is 12 pumps. Please add a note stating that 12 pumps are allowed and that 12 pumps are provided. Also add a note stating the type of drive-through that will be provided, i.e. pharmacy or satellite bank. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/09/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |