Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04OT00853
Parcel: 137041430

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04OT00853
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/10/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/14/2004 Andrew Connor NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per
DS 2-15.0.
06/14/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Plants used for screening purposes may not be smaller than a (5) gallon can size when planted per LUC 3.7.3.7.C.1

2. 20% of shrubs in landscape border are required to be 5 gallon size DS 2-06.3.5.F

3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per
DS 2-07.2.2.2.g

4. Revise plant symbols to reflect ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.c

5. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7

6. Provide a minimum of one (1) canopy tree within the vehicular use area per LUC 3.7.2.3 Canopy trees located within ten (10) feet of a vehicular use area may be counted toward the canopy tree requirement.

7. A 6' screen for refuse storage is required for adjacent properties LUC Table 3.7.2-I

8. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per
DS 2-15.0.
06/23/2004 Peter McLaughlin ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Octavio Santamaria
4280 S. Sheridan
Tucson, AZ 85735
(520) 909-6051

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.

PROJECT:
T04OT00853
Alex Auto II
5401 S. Nogales Highway
Change of Use
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: June 25, 2004

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed as a new use/change of use. Full code compliance is required.
DS 2-02

2. Revise the adjacent zoning to the east to read "I-1".
DS 2-02.2.1.A.28

3. Add the existing and future sight visibility triangles at the access drive along Old Nogales Highway.
DS 2-02.1.A.10

4. Add the development designators to the project data notes. The development designator for the vehicle sales use in the C-2 zone is "31". Also, add the restrictions which the proposed use is subject to. The vehicle sales use in the C-2 zone is subject to LUC 3.5.9.5.A and 3.5.9.5.B, which limit the use of outdoor lighting. Demonstrate compliance by detailing all proposed freestanding lighting on the plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31
LUC 2.5.4.2.B.6

5. Provide loading zone calcs based on the proposed vehicle sales use and the square footage of the proposed buildings, A loading space for the vehicle sales use will not be required for a building of less than 1,500 square feet as proposed. Add a note stating that no loading spaces are required or provided.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.5

6. Revise the north arrow to point to true north. This site is configured at an angle to north as indicated by the location plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.1

7. Label any easements on the site with widths dimensioned, the purpose and the recordation information (docket and page reference numbers).
DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

8. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. If applicable, demonstrate compliance with LUC 3.5.4.26. Also, add the location, type, size and height of any proposed signage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13

9. Provide the height and dimensions of the proposed building on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6

10. Please dimension clearly all MS&R street monument lines from Old Nogales Highway centerline, including future curbs (if different from existing), and future right-of-way (if different from existing right-of-way), and future sidewalks (if applicable).
DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 and .21

11. According to Assessors records this site is made up of five lots. These lots must be combined with an Assessors tax combo form and a recorded covenant which can be obtained from the zoning review counter. Please provide documentation of lot combination.

12. Areas that are striped pedestrian paths which are not cross-walks must be made of concrete and be physically separated from adjacent PAALs/vehicle use area. Please revise 4'pedestrian striped to provide physical separation.
DS 2-08.4.1

13. Add a Floor Area Ratio calculation to the site plan including maximum allowed and proposed FAR. The FAR is calculated as the Gross Floor Area divided by the site area.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.10
DS 3-03.2.2.C
DS 3-01.5

14. Add the existing use of the site (i.e. vacant). DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.

PMc\siteplans04\T04OT00853a
06/25/2004 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved
07/07/2004 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 7, 2004
TO: Octavio Santamaria
SUBJECT: Alex Auto Sales, Site Plan Review
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04OT00853

SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on July 7, 2004. The Site Plan was not approved at this time. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:
1) Use a standard engineering scale for the site plan. All of the site plan must be drawn to scale. (DS 2-02.2.1.A)
2) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.17)
3) Clearly show and dimension the existing and future right-of-way. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19)
4) Clearly show and label sight visibility triangles (SVT) for both the existing and future right of way.
5) The site plan proposes to use the right-of way adjacent to this project for the basins. Revise the plans to provide on-site basins. The basins must also be shown outside of the future right-of-way.
6) Clearly dimension the basins. Indicate the 100-year water surface elevation.
Drainage Report Comments
7) Number each page of the Drainage Report. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.1.G)
8) Revise the maintenance section to identify the persons responsible for basin maintenance. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.2.E.1)
9) The Site Plan in the Drainage Report must provide enough detail to determine whether the

Revise the Site Plan and Drainage Report to address these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed.
Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/08/2004 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/08/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed