Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04OT00192
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/23/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Lane signs required as noted on plan. |
| 04/23/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 04/23/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 4/22/2004 See Zoning comments |
| 04/23/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/23/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 4/22/2004 1) The loading zone in the south west corner of the site must be removed. It does not meet minimum code requirements and encroaches into the required PAAL in that area, 2) All dumpster which are not in the orginal locations, as depicted on the development plan recorded in bk 6 pg 92 must be fully dimensioned, screened, and may not interfere in other required uses of the site, 3) Show all awnings, fully dimensioned, on the site plan, 4) The new patio areas around buildings A and C may not use the MS&R reduction per the last approved site plan because they are new square footage. Revise calculations as required, 5) Since additional parking is provided (since the development plan detailed above) those spaces must be fully dimensioned ( There appears to be 10 additional spaces), 6) The two new handi-cap spaces must be fully dimensioned, including signage and access requirements, on the site plan, 7) Provide a landscape plan which demonstrates compliance with the landscape requirements listed on the recoreded development plan listed above. The islands in the parking lot may not be removed if trees are need to meet the minimum Gateway requirements listed on the plan, 8) The southeast corner of building A does not match that shown on the recorded dp. Please explain, 9) Demonstrate that the Peguins outdoor patio area does not interfer with the 4 foot sidewalk around the building, 10) Provide a breakdown of the existing uses by square footage on the site plan, 11) On-site inspections have revealed that the as-built site plan does not match what is going on on the site. Revise as required. |
| 04/23/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 23, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04OT00192 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: 3175 N. Campbell PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E., CFM The following items must be revised or added to the Site Plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Resubmittal Required: Site Plan SITE PLAN COMMENTS 1. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Site Plan approval. 2. All dumpster which are not in the orginal locations must be fully dimensioned, screened, and may not interfere in other required uses of the site. Access to the dumpsters must comply with DS 6-01. Contact John Clark, 791-3175 for approval of dumpster locations. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/01/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |