Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T04OT00172
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/06/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Submit code review checklist. |
| 04/12/2004 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Add note to General Notes: All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a 10-year flood event. 2. General Notes #18 is incorrect. The project site is in a FEMA Floodplain, Zone AE as per Panel 1639K, dated February 8, 1999. Correct and revise. 3. Indicate proposed contour lines. 4.Justify the FFE for proposed structure. My calculations for the BFE is 2385.75, therefore the FFE is 2386.75. 5. Indicate flow arrows for V-ditch. 6. Refer to Site Plan with note "REDLINES 2ND SUBMITTAL" for further comments. Drainage Report 1. Indicate FFE for proposed structure. 2. Indicate Datum for elevations on Pages 1, 8 and 9. 3. Indicate Q acceptance and discharge for project site, V-ditch and Retention Basin. 4. Indicate explanation and calculation for V-ditch. |
| 04/21/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next Submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments Regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were Addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Food Service (Restaurant) is "subject to" LUC Sec. 3.5.4.6.A and .C. Please note the "subject to" section under the zoning notes on sheet 1 of 7. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 2. Per LUC Table 3.3.7-I, 90 degree vehicle parking spaces required a 24 foot wide PAAL to back out onto. Please revise the PAAL width for the rear parking lot. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 3. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. 4. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/22/2004 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/28/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place shall remain undisturbed for the circumference of the drip line of the trees. Under no circumstances shall grading encroach to the base or trunk of a preserved plants per DS 2-15.6.0.A. According to Detail D on sheet 3 a 1.5-ft. space is indicated between paved area and existing wall this will not satisfy the development standard. Revise the grading, site, and landscape plans as necessary |
| 04/29/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place shall remain undisturbed for the circumference of the drip line of the trees. Under no circumstances shall grading encroach to the base or trunk of a preserved plants per DS 2-15.6.0.A. According to Detail D on sheet 3 a 1.5-ft. space is indicated between paved area and existing wall this will not satisfy the development standard. Revise the grading, site, and landscape plans as necessary |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/29/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |