Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM05559
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/07/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/07/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide calculations to show that the addition complies with Section 101.3, IECC 2000. 2. Show all modifications to the mechanical systems and show the new air conditioner. 3. Provide calculations to show that the ventilation for the space conforms to Section 401, IMC 2000. |
| 02/07/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/14/2005 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2005 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/07/2005 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 3/1/05 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM05330 & T04CM05559 PROJECT NAME: Exercise Room & Addition Business Office PROJECT ADDRESS: 5353 E 22 ND St. #101 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: Antonio Romano PROJECT REVIEWER: Christy Foreman TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) Need to have a complete site plan showing all buildings. Locate on site the building that is being remodeled. Dimensions from other buildings. Justify per code section 302.3.2. 2) Separated use 2 hour separation between B and R2 use. Please clarify / locate and provide wall section. 3) Exercise room A-3 use? See section 302.2.1. Please clarify / justify. 4) Separated use see table 302.3.2, 2 hr. fire separation required between a B use and R2/A3. Please clarify / justify. 5) Detail connection of beam 5 1/8" x 12" GLM beam at existing wall. 6) Clarify exercise room 1 story or 2 story structure. Provide calculations accordingly. Beams carrying roof and flooring load? 7) Clarify existing roof framing direction of spans by rafters / floor joists. Existing office and exercise room. 8) Clarify location of shear walls and detail on drawings.. 9) Clarify accessibility Chapter 11 accessible route section 1104. 10) Justify / clarify per section 903.2.7 & 907.2.10.1.2. 11) Structural Engineer need to review and stamp sht. 4/4. |
| 03/10/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | The approved site plan shows a pedestrian sidewalk connecting to the sidewalk located within the existing right-of-way along 22nd Street. This ped. connection is required and the 5-foot pedestrian refuge shown on the partial site plan must also include a 4-foot sidewalk. Revise plan to show accessible pedestrian route between the new addition and the PAAL. Also, for reference, show the parking spaces as they exist within the vehicle use area shown on the partial site plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/28/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |