Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM05536
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2005 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Development shall not unnecessarily alter riparian habitats of watercourses and adjacent bank areas per TCC Sec. 26-5.1.Submit any requested documentation by the engineering division to continue landscape review. |
| 01/06/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/24/2005 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 01/24/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments 1. The residential site/building plans have been reviewed but cannot be approved at this time. The following criteria must be addressed. a. G. For any new single family dwelling in the R-1 zone with five (5) bedrooms, three (3) parking spaces are required. For every bedroom over five (5), one additional space is required for each bedroom. H. For all single family dwellings in the R-1 zone with five (5) or more bedrooms, and for all lots containing two (2) or more single family dwellings, with the second dwelling having more than one bedroom, all parking and maneuvering must be located on-site, either in a side or rear perimeter yard. The vehicular use area must be improved, which includes surfacing, striping, and provision of barriers, in conformance with Development Standard 3-05.0. Parking spaces may not be located in a vehicular use area in any front street perimeter yard. This site must be developed to comply with the criteria as specified. 2. Submit a copy of the building plans which include a floorplan and building elevations. |
| 01/24/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/28/2005 | Doug Williams | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Hydrology data and Floodplain permit review comments - 2601 W. Arthur Pl. REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 28 January 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM05536/T04OT02495 T14S, R13E, Section 28 Resubmittal Required: Revised Site Plan and Hydrology report. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the subject plans and drainage submittal. Approvals are not recommended at this time. Proposed development in the regulatory floodplain must conform to Chapter 26, Tucson Code. Particular attention should be given to Sections 26-5.2, 26-7 and 26-11. The drainage submittal must conform to Hydrology Report format and content requirements outlined in Section 2.3.1 of the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (Development Standard 10-02.0). Additional information may be necessary prior to approvals, depending on the nature and extent of subsequent plan revisions. Please address the following comments at a minimum, prior to resubmittal: 1. Depict the existing and developed conditions 100-year (regulatory) floodplain limits, with water surface elevations provided at the upstream-most portion of the proposed structure. 2. Provide all supporting data for Manning's cross-sections and floodplain delineations for existing and developed conditions (see summary above relating to hydrology report content requirements) 3. Provide an encroachment analysis demonstrating no adverse impact will occur to adjacent properties - upstream or downstream or in the public right of way. 4. Provide a cross-section at the property line/driveway entrance with depth of flow indicated, demonstrating all weather access will be provided on this lot. 5. Provide dimensioning for the proposed overhang's footing dimensions and depths, and revise the bank protection detail (A) to match detail (B). 6. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. 7. Provide a soils and geotechnical engineering evaluation/report. A grading permit will be required for this proposed development. Submit two (2) sets of grading plans with a grading permit application. No clearing, grubbing or other earthwork is permitted on this site prior to grading permit issuance. Site grading shall be in conformance with the Development Standard 11-01.0 (Excavation and Grading). For further information, visit http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStd1101.pdf If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 12/27/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/31/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/31/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |