Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T04CM05458
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/17/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/17/2004 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2004 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T04CM05458 DENIED 12/17/04 1. Service total is listed as 38,600 VA. This would be only 107.2 A at 208 V, which is smaller than Panel A. Please clarify. 2. Ckt A-38,40,42 reads "Panel A2". Should read "Panel A1." 3. It appears that the intent is to series rate the new CB at Panel A with the CBs at Panel A1. If so, make that explicit. Also: I would question the 10K rating of Panel A itself, being so close to the termination can (20.1 KA AFC). 4. Line diagram lists new CB at 60A. It is 50 A on Panel A. 50 A is correct because the ampacity of #8 is only 50. |
| 12/17/2004 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/22/2004 | LLESNY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/22/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |