Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM05424
Parcel: 116270060

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T04CM05424
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/22/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/29/2005 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied Site plan approval required prior to bldg. approval.
10/06/2005 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Include all fixtures (e.g. the electric water cooler, and the sink and hose bibb at the ramada) when calculating the total water demand and determining pipe sizes. Use "public" values for fixture units (e.g. the two kitchen sinks and the dishwasher). Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994.
2. If a reduced pressure backflow preventer is used for the icemaker, provide a drain for the assembly.
10/06/2005 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Third request. The minimum circuit ampacity and the maximum circuit protection for the A/C units do not meet the manufacturer's requirements. Coordinate the electrical requirements for the HVAC units with the electrical design.
2. The electrical design does not address providing power for either the makeup air unit or the exhaust fan for the Type I hood.
3. Provide details and calculations showing the support of the hood and grease duct from the building structure (the hanging angle detail, shown on sheet A4.2, is incomplete). Reference Section 506.3.4 and 507.6, IMC 2000.
4. Provide a cut sheet for the proposed hood that shows the name of the manufacturer of the hood and that the hood is tested per UL 710, listed, and labeled for operation with an airflow of 2100 CFM or comply with the minimum airflow requirements of Section 507.13.3, IMC 2000. Reference Section 507.1, IMC 2000.
5. Revise the grease duct enclosure to comply with the requirements of Section 506.3.11, IMC 2000.
6. Revise the discharge height of EF-2 as shown in detail 5/M1 to show a minimum height of 40" from the roof surface to the exhaust outlet, not the top of the fan motor cover.
10/27/2005 BOB SUBA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
11/10/2005 RAUL PALMA BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied City of Tucson, Development Services
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS


7/25/05


3) Provide exhaust hood connection details.

11/10/05

1) Comply to comment no. 3 from comments dated 7/25/05.
2) Provide engineering calc`s for CMU wall at addition at clubhouse.
3) Provide complete detail of handrail connection.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/15/2005 JMORALE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/15/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed