City of Tucson

Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T04CM05424

Parcel: 116270060

Address:

3003 W BROADWAY BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T04CM05424

Review Name: RESUBMITTAL

Review Status: Completed

Review Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description	Status	Comments
06/27/2005	JIM EGAN	FIRE	REVIEW	Denied	1. Fire hydrant required. Submit approved City of Tucson Water Plan. 2. Type 1 exhaust hood and fire suppression system required for Kitchen Range. 3. Remove "Fire Sprinkler System" note from "Project Data" The fire department does not make final determination for requirements. Requirements are determined by the Building Code, Architect and Building Owner.
06/29/2005	ROBERT SHERRY	MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	1. Second request. The minimum circuit ampacity and the maximum circuit protection for the units do not meet the manufacturer's requirements. Coordinate the electrical requirements for the HVAC units with the electrical design. 2. Second request. Provide a complete design for the Type I hood (i.e. mechanical, electrical, and structural). Reference Section 507.2.2 IMC 2000.
06/29/2005	ROBERT SHERRY	PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	1. Note 2.22 on sheet A2.1 calls out a grill next to the range. Is it gas-fired, electric, or solid-fueled? Coordinate the plumbing plan with the architectural plan to include all existing and new plumbing fixtures. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 2. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures on the drawing. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 3. Sheet C1.1 shows the route and size of the water line from the clubhouse to the ramada but does not show the route of the water supply line to the clubhouse from the water meter on the drawing. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 4. Include all fixtures and directly connected appliances when calculating the total water demand and determining pipe sizes. Refer to keynotes #1 and #11 on sheet P1. Count the fixtures (e.g. hose bibbs, floor drains) shown on the plumbing floor plan on sheet P1. Use "public" values for fixture units. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994. See the Commercial Plan Review Submittal Requirements for the City of Tucson on http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/. Provide water supply isometrics. (Note: All plans require a minimum 10pt font.) Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 5. The equipment sheets for the ice maker do not indicate if it has integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps. Provide backflow protection per Section 603.0, UPC 1994. 6. Exception #4 to Section 707.4 is not applicable in this case. (Note also that exception # 4 to Section 707.4 refers to an "approved type of two-way cleanout fitting"; a field-fabricated two-way cleanout constructed with combination wye fittings is in violation of Section 707.6, UPC 1994.) Provide an upper terminal cleanout for the last water closet in the women's restroom. Reference Sections 707.4 and 707.5, UPC 1994.
07/05/2005	BOB SUBA	ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Approved
07/25/2005	DOUG WILLIAMS	ENGINEERING	REVIEW	Approved
07/25/2005	RAUL PALMA	BUILDING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Where does detail 6/S3.2 apply? 2) How is the shear being transferred in detail 9/S3.2? Show all nailing, from the diaphragm to the beam and down to the column and footing. 3) Compute the diaphragm nailing in calc`s. 4) Specify the zip code in calc`s. 5) On sheet 31 you specify STAAD OUTPUT where is this on calc`s? 6) Provide connection detail of handrail. 7) Provide panic hardware at all exit doors. 8) Provide exit signs at exit doors. 9) Provide exhaust hood connection details. 7/25/05 1) Refer to comment no. 1 above, cross-reference to where detail has been cut. 2) Refer to comment no. 2 above, comment is asking for all nailing. 3) Provide exhaust hood connection details.
07/27/2005	PETER MCLAUGHLIN	ZONING	REVIEW	Denied	Approved site plan required.

Final Status

Task End Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description
09/21/2005	KMEDINA1	OUT TO CUSTOMER	Completed