Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM05288
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: GDA DATE: January 11, 2005 Architects 250 S. Craycroft Road Tucson, Arizona 85711 SUBJECT: 3050 N. Swan Road Site plan T04CM05288 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 35 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. Lot dimensions do not scale to distance shown. 4. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 5. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 6. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 7. Include a detail of the Ret./Det. basin on the SP, including dimensions and cross-sections with the railing shown. 8. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. 9. Show Site plan number (T04CM05288) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 10. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The refuse enclosure cannot be placed in the floodway per Chap. 26-5.2.13 and D.S. 6-01.4.1F. Perhaps another place can be found for the enclosure. 11. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 12. Obtain permission to build the bleeder pipe draining into the existing concrete channel from the adjacent property owners and provide documentation. 13. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes, paving material and thickness. Will there be a grade break at the egress/ingress between the two properties? Is there any stormwater coming from the property to the west? 14. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 15. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 16. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is required during Grading plan submittal. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Site plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 3. List the velocity and depth of the existing and proposed drainage from the off-site areas. The depth shall not exceed 1' in the P.A.A.L. The allowable amount of discharge in a street is 50 cfs, in extreme cases; the allowable amount is 100 cfs. 4. An energy dissipater may be required depending on the velocity of the discharge entering and exiting the site. 5. The refuse enclosure cannot be placed in the floodway per Chap. 26-5.2.13 and D.S. 6-01.4.1F. Perhaps another place can be found for the enclosure. 6. Include a detail of the Ret./Det. basin in the DR, including dimensions and cross-sections with railing. 7. Demonstrate basin stability with the amount and velocity of discharge going through the property and into the basin edge. Will rock riprap be used on the West Side of the basin? Include size of rock. 8. Include scupper calculations for drainage into the basin. 9. Show the project address on the cover of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3050 N. Swan Road Site |
| 12/08/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire hydrant required. |
| 12/08/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Protected Native Plants shall be planted in locations able to support their long-term health and survival. Basin tree plantings along top of side slopes do not meet requirements per LUC 3.8.6.6.C. If necessary include planting detail to show how transplanted native trees will be incorporated within basin design. 2. Retention Basin slope/depth shall be a maximum of 4:1 where depths are equal to/or greater than (3) ft. DS 10-01.4.3 page 78 3. Basin Configuration shall require access for regular maintenance including landscaping per DS 10-01.4.3 page 74 4. Provide a 5' wall to screen the vehicle use areas from adjacent office zoned properties along the east site boundaries per LUC Table 3.7.2-1 5. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) Additional trees are required for the vehicle use area per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a |
| 12/10/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Protected Native Plants shall be planted in locations able to support their long-term health and survival. Basin tree plantings along top of side slopes do not meet requirements per LUC 3.8.6.6.C. If necessary include planting detail to show how transplanted native trees will be incorporated within basin design. |
| 12/28/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Metro Permit Express 1001 N. Alvernon Way #105 Tucson, AZ 85711 (520) 977-7187 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner Development Services Dept. FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T04CM05288 Swan Road Office Building 3050 N. Swan Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: December 28, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed for full code compliance. DS 2-02 2. Revise the adjacent zoning to the southwest to read C-2 rather than C-3. The zoning designator text to the east of the site is overstruck with an elevation figure, making it difficult to read. Revise. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 3. The Assessors Record maps indicate that the project site is made up of two lots. The lots must be combined prior to site plan approval. Provide Copies of recorded and notarized Covenant Regarding Use of Real Property. These forms are available at the Zoning Review counter at Development Services Department. DS 3-05.2.3.C 4. Revise the legal description to be correct The first part should read: "PTN N300' E326.96' W722' S2 NW4 NW4 1.63 AC SEC 35-13-14", and the second part should read: W111.01' E781.90' S150.28' N300.28' S2 NW4 NW4 .38 AC SEC 35-13-14. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 5. It is unclear from the drawing how pedestrian circulation system connects to Swan Road. Clarify on the drawing whether the sidewalk/crosswalk to leading westward from the building connects to any existing pedestrian walks. DS 2-08 DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 6. A minimum of two feet is required between the PAAL and the proposed guardrail along the north property line. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation and delivery vehicles. Revise plan to show 2-foot space. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 7. Based on the bicycle parking calculation, the bicycle parking label in the southeast corner of the site should read "8 class I spaces" rather than "8 class II spaces". Revise as necessary. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 8. Indicate the location of any proposed freestanding lighting on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 9. Show the location, size and height of any proposed freestanding signage. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 12/28/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/12/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |