Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T04CM05074
Parcel: 123141460

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW

Permit Number - T04CM05074
Review Name: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/02/2005 Andrew Connor NPPO REVIEW Denied This project is subject to the provisions of LUC 3.8 Native Plant Preservation. Submit a native plant preservation plan per DS 2-15.0 or an application for exception. http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf
02/02/2005 Gerry Koziol WWM REVIEW Approved
02/11/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 02/11/05

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Senior Planner

Comments:

1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and site plan but cannot approve them at this time. Zoning will re-review and approve the building and site plans on the next submittal providing the stamped and approved site plans are included with the building plan package.

Vehicular Use Areas. The following requirements apply to developments which provide more than four (4) motor vehicle parking spaces.

A. Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas.

1. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each ten (10) motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof.

a. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).

b. In areas where a required landscape border falls within the vehicular use area, up to 50% of the canopy trees may be counted towards both the minimum parking lot canopy tree requirement and the landscape border canopy tree requirement.

c. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree.

d. Structurally covered or underground motor vehicle parking spaces are not included in calculating the required number and location of canopy trees.

3. Also, discussion primary access via an alley is to be discussed on Monday 14, 2005. The discussion is related to whether or not primary vehicle access for for a second unit should be allowed through an alley. A determination will be made and resolution sometime the same week. The discussion will also include the than four parking spaces requirements ans mentioned in comment 2.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/16/2005 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed