Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM04795
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/16/2004 | Gerry Koziol | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need review location/method of connection to public sewer |
| 11/22/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope. Reference Section 101.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2000. 2. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference Section 401, IMC 2000. 3. Clarify the meaning of the symbol tied to the primary and secondary condensate drains on sheet M1.1. 4. Clarify how the secondary condensate drains are to be installed; the note on sheet M1.1 calls for drain pans under the fan coils but detail 3/M2.0 shows the secondary drain originating at the fan coil with no drain pan. 5. Clarify how the exhaust duct for EF-3 is to be routed. 6. Recirculation of ventilation air from toilet rooms is prohibited. Reference Section 403.2.1 (3) and Table 403.3, footnote b, IMC 2000. 7. Clarify the sequence of operation for transfer fan TF-1 and the direction of the airflow. |
| 11/22/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Coordinate the size of the domestic water line to the building; it is shown as 1-1/2" on sheet C-5 and as 2" on sheet P1.0. Ensure that the reduced pressure backflow preventor is sized to comply with Section 610.2, UPC 1994. 2. The plumbing fixture schedule on sheet P2.0 calls out a 1-1/2" spud for the water closet but the water piping diagram on sheet P1.0 shows 1" connection sizes for the water closet. Coordinate the pipe sizes to comply with Section 610.10, UPC 1994. 3. Coordinate the pipe sizes shown on the water piping diagram with the submitted water calculations. |
| 11/22/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/29/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Submit pole and foundation calculations for all poles over 20' in height, sealed by a Registered Structural Engineer. Pole and foundation details for all poles over 20' in height shall be sealed by a Registered Structural Engineer, and shall pass review by the Building/Structural Plans Examiner. 2. Provide cut sheets for all exterior lighting fixtures and lamps. Identify exactly which fixture and lamp is being used in each case. Verify compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Outdoor_Lighting_Code.pdf), and suitability for location. 3. On Sheet E2.1, notes 2, 9, and 16 make reference to the previous National Electric Code. Please correct all references such that they pertain to the 2002 National Electric Code. Typical. 4. Please provide cut sheets for Drive-Through Blowers. It is unclear from the plans whether Code-required motor disconnects are provided. 5. Each 3" conduit between the 600A disconnect and Distribution Panel DP shall have a #1 minimum Equipment Grounding Conductor, sized per Table 250-122. 6. The #2 GND in the conduit between the utility transformer and the SES, and between the SES and the service disconnect, consists of a parallel path to ground, and shall be deleted. 7. Minimum font size is 10-point, which is a bit over 1/8". Please enlarge fault calculations, and all other elements of design where this applies (Panel Schedule Symbols, One Line Diagram General Notes, etc.). |
| 11/30/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/03/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 12/03/04 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. Zoning will re-review and approve if possible the building plans on the next submittal providing the stamped and approved site plans are included with the building plan package. 2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan, may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
| 12/20/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) The Glu-Lam beams shown at the drive-thru are shown on calcs as having a 3.5' cantilever. However scaling the plans they are more like 7'. Provide correct design for the actual cantilever. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/23/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/23/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |