Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM04793
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0. Not addressed from previous comments. |
| 01/06/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM04793 3183 N. Freeway Industrial Loop New General Manufacturing Site Site Plan Transmittal date: 1st Review November 30, 2004 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This has not been addressed. Per the response to the zoning comments a copy of the lot combo was to be attached. The lot combo form and Assessor's lot combo was not with the site plan package. Previous Comment: A completed and recorded lot combo form will be required prior to approval of the site plan. In addition to the lot combo requirement a parcel tax code combo must be completed through the Pima County Assessor's Office. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 2. I am willing to review the lot combo covenant over the counter provided that all other reviewers approve the site plan. Please contact me to set up an appointment if the applicant wishes to and if all other reviewers have approved the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Requested documents. |
| 01/06/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/22/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include hard copy with re-submittal of approved tentative plat Case # S99-053 and Board Adjustment Variance Case # C10-00-19 as stated in landscape legend on sheet C4. 2. Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0. Not addressed from previous comments. 3. Additional comments may apply upon review of these documents. |
| 12/30/2004 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Assignment by JPV. |
| 12/30/2004 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site/Grading Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Remove incorrect "North arrow". 3. A location map should be drawn as follows D.S. 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D · Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area. · Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. · Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. Indicate legal property description. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Indicate correct lot dimensions and bearings. A lot combination will be required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 5. Indicate location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways. This can be indicated on the location map. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.22 6. Indicate spot elevation if existing or proposed in legend. 7. Indicate new contour lines if any. 8. For an area of 1.62 acres, it appears that the proposed cut and fill quantities of 20 cubic yards is too low. Correct and revise. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2005 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |