Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM04793
Parcel: 107020200

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04CM04793
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/22/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/30/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0.
11/30/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Include approved tentative plat Case # S99-053 and Board Adjustment Variance Case # C10-00-19 with re-submittal to continue review.

2. Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0.

3. Additional comments may apply.
11/30/2004 David Rivera ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: David Rivera
Senior Planner
FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T04CM04793
3183 N. Freeway Industrial Loop
New General Manufacturing Site
Site Plan

Transmittal date: 1st Review November 30, 2004

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Add a true north arrow to the site plan drawing. DS 2-02.2.A.1

2. Revise the legal description to state the correct subdivision plat name and add the map and plat number 54/18. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

3. List the correct address of the properties to be developed. The address for the lot in question is listed on the Pima County Mapguide website as 3183. Revise as required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.3

4. Add and label to the location map the delineation of the Santa Cruz River. Also, please label the street "Freeway Industrial Loop". DS 2-02.2.1.A.4

5. A completed and recorded lot combo form will be required prior to approval of the site plan. In addition to the lot combo requirement a parcel tax code combo must be completed through the Pima County Assessor's Office. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5

6. Please clarify if the 10'x28' modular structure is the only structure proposed on this site. Please indicate on the plan if a Ramada or some form of structure will be placed over the concrete slab or storage sheds. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6

7. Parking is based on the GFA of the building or any area that is used for the manufacturing of goods on site. In order to insure that the correct number of parking spaces have been provided the use or the type of manufacturing and location on the site where the manufacturing will occur must be clarified, listed, and defined/dimensioned on the site plan. Additional comments may forthcoming on this issue on the next review of the revised plan and proposed use and location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8

8. Bicycle parking is based on the number of parking spaces provided on site at a ratio of 90 percent class one and 10 percent class two facilities. At this time I cannot verify the number of bicycle parking spaces required until other issues are addressed, (See comment 7). Indicate on the site plan, the location of the bicycle parking facility. The facility must be located next to the pedestrian path (sidewalk). The type of surfacing must be listed and the type of lighting must be drawn and labeled. Additional comments may forthcoming on this issue on the next review of the revised plan and proposed use and location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9

9. Existing and if applicable future sight visibility triangles must be drawn, dimensioned, labeled on the site plan sheet. See Engineering reviewer comments related to this standard. (The legend includes a symbol for the SVT but the SVT's were not drawn on the site plan.) DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

10. A four-foot wide concrete sidewalk must be constructed from the sidewalk in the right-of-way to the onsite pedestrian sidewalk. The sidewalk must lead to the building. Also this sidewalk may be the accessible route but must meet all ADA requirements. The minimum slopes for any ramp must be no greater than 1:12. Please demonstrate on the plan how this standard will be met. A requirement to provide pedestrian circulation to other work areas may be required. Review of the revised site plan will determine whether additional sidewalks are required. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this standard. DS 2-02.2.1.A.

11. If applicable draw the location of all existing or proposed freestanding signs including existing billboards. The location, size, and type of sign must be labeled. DS 2-02.21.A.13

12. The number of loading zones is determined by the gross floor area of the building including any outside area that is utilized for the use. If this is a general manufacturing use as stated in the code data all areas that are used for the manufacturing will be counted as floor area in order to determiner the number of loading zones required. Additional comments may forthcoming on this standard and LUC requirement. DS 2-02.2.1.A.14

13. If applicable all easements of records or proposed easements must be drawn and labeled on the site plan. The location, purpose and width of the easement must be labeled. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

14. The centerline of the Freeway Industrial Loop must be depicted and labeled on the site plan. The centerline to curb and curb to property line must be dimensioned. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21

15. If applicable, existing or proposed freestanding lighting must be drawn on the site plan. The location, type, and height of the light poles must be labeled. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

16. See the Landscape reviewer comments related to requirements for landscape borders, screening, and NPPO. DS 2-02.2.A.27

17. Label the zoning classification adjacent to the west property line. The zoning per the COT zoning maps is designated as I-1. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28

18. List the existing use of the property. If the property is vacant list as "Existing use - Vacant". If the site is developed or is used in conjunction with a use that is not on the site please state so. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

19. Please show the location and type of the refuse proposed for this development. See Engineering comments related to this standard. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32

20. Please revise the front setback note to state that the setback is based on the "greatest of 20 feet or one and one-half times the height. Please list the height of the proposed modular structure and list the overall height from design grade to the tallest point of a gable roof. (the building setbacks are based on the height from design grade to the tallest point of the gable end of the roof, top of parapet etc.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents.
12/06/2004 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Site Plan
1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal.

2. North arrow orientation is incorrect. Indicate contour intervals. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1

3. Indicate legal property description. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2

4. Indicate correct project addresses. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3

5. Indicate street name; "Freeway Industrial Loop" on the location map. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4

6. Indicate correct lot dimensions and bearings. A lot combination will be required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5

7. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E

8. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles. SVT's for a PAAL onto a Local street are 185' for Near and 110' for Far. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10

9. If applicable, indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13

10. Delineate limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation (when applicable). D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.15

11. Indicate drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. Do not obstruct offsite to onsite flows. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16

12. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. Delineate Grading Limits. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17


13. Dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way. Indicate street centerline. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19

14. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and all utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

15. Indicate location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways. This can be indicated on the location map. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.22

16. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23

17. Indicate refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned. Indicate a refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2 New projects, including mobile home parks, consisting of 3 or more dwelling units will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection and pickup areas. Contact John Clark of Environmental Services @ 791-3175 ext. 1136 to reach an agreement that does not meet Development Standards 6-01 and to obtain a DSMR.
12/08/2004 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied see zoning comments

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/08/2004 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/08/2004 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed