Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T04CM04663
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2005 | Christy Foreman | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 1-4-05 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM04663 PROJECT NAME: 58 DEGREES AND HOLDING CO. PROJECT ADDRESS: 5340 E. BROADWAY BLVD. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: BMG INC. PROJECT REVIEWER: CHRISTY FOREMAN TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) 1008 Doors shall easily be recognizable as doors. Means of egress doors shall not be concealed by curtains, drapes, decorations, or similar materials. Separation between lounge and retail. Door to storage facility cannot be used as a required exit per section 1013.2 2) Clarify location of mech / floor framing with architectural & structural plans. it appears note 26 on sht. A.1(Men's toilet room) on area not structurally designed by structural engineer. Sht. A4.1 (Roof plan) shows a different location. Also clarify load of equipment for large hatched box shown @ southwest corner of back office. 3) Coordinate mech. Equipment note 13 sht.A2.1 with structural drawing sht S2.1 4) Clarify note 27 & 28 sht. A2.1 access floor framing. Why access over door? Cannot block exit way with ladder. 5) Signage must be posted - Floor not designed for storage use or it must be designed with additional load by structural engineer. 6) Service entry door appears to reduce the landing width to less than one-half. Suggest hinging door from the other side for safer clearance of stairway. 7) Further coordination / specification is required between architectural, structural, and details to clarify framing. a) Dtl. 11/a1.2 specify structural column and clarify connection between structural column and pre-cast concrete. b) Location of dtl. 2/a1.2 c) Clarify wall section at each interior wall location - private lockers/storage lockers, mens/womens restroom, kitchen/lounge, janitor/kitchen d) Coordinate between dtl 12/a1.2 and dtl 10/s1.1 |
| 01/12/2005 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/12/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide justification for the occupant load and the flow rate of outside air provided for the occupants of the wine lounge. Reference Section 403.3, IMC 2000. 2. Show how the ventilation calculations comply with the requirements of Section 403.3.2, IMC 2000. 3. Coordinate the installation of the smoke detector in the return air duct of AC-1with electrical. The electrical plans call for the detector to be installed in the location shown on the mechanical plans. Reference Section 606.1, IMC. 4. Clarify how "ladder access to 8'-0" AFF" is being provided for the equipment located in the attic space. Reference Section 306.3, IMC 2000. 5. Show the location of the unobstructed passageway to the fan coils and the minimum 30" service space for each fan coil. Reference Section 306.3, IMC 2000. |
| 01/12/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/12/2005 | Robert Sherry | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Second request. Appliances to be directly connected to the water supply system (e.g. ice machine and glass washer) that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps may require reduced pressure principle backflow preventers. Please submit equipment sheets for determination. Note: the Watts 9BD specified for the ice machine is too small for the ice machine (Section 610.2, UPC 1994). Reference Section 603.0, UPC 1994. 2. Sheet P1.1 (Revision PC1) still shows the reduced pressure backflow preventer being 1" with both a 1" and a 2"water line attached. Resize the reduced pressure backflow preventor to comply to Section 610.2, UPC 1994. 3. Provide concurrence from the Pima County Health Department that the 3-compartment sink is not required for this installation. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 4. Detail 4/P1.1 shows a ½"CW pipe serving both the ice machine and a hand sink, a total of 12 fixture units. Revise to correspond to the provided water calculations. 5. Show the sizes of the HW pipes between the water heater and the branch to the restroom. 6. Revise the gas piping schematic to include the total connected load, the load for the generator, and the total developed length. |
| 01/12/2005 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/12/2005 | Robert Suba | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/12/2005 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | TI & not in flood-prone area. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2005 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/12/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |