Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM04610
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Fire approval for fire hydrant locations and emergency vehicle access only. |
| 10/21/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 |
| 10/21/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 6ft. wall is required to screen the loading zone from adjacent residential zoned property to north per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2. Refuse Storage screen wall is required to be 6ft. per LUC 3.7.2-1. Revise keynote #5 on Sheet C202 2 of as necessary. 3. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 |
| 10/21/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next Submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments Regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were Addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. The legal descriptions for both lots listed in Pima County Assessors records do not include any portion of the alley. Provide documentation, which shows the east 10' of the alley has been added to the subject property, otherwise, revise the legal description and lot dimensions as required. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5) 2. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two (2) lots, which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. You may obtain a copy of the covenant online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf or you may contact me at the number below. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.A) 3. List the project address on the cover sheet/general note five (5). (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3) 4. Two (2) different proposed building heights are listed on the plan. The drawing notes a 26 foot height and the note under site plan and calculations note 3 indicates a 22 foot building height. Revise all applicable notes and drawing to show the correct building height proposed and provide the minimum required building setback. In addition revise the maximum allowed building height to 40 feet. 75 foot is incorrect. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 5. Revise the building setback requirements graphically and by note to be based on the correct building height proposed. The correct building setback required from 14th Avenue is based on the greater of, 21' or the building height measured from the edge of nearest travel lane. Since the site is adjacent to a Major Street and Route (MS&R), all other streets abutting the subject property must meet developing area setback requirements. (D.S. 2-02.2.A.7) (LUC 3.2.6.5.B.1) 6. The correct number of vehicle parking spaces is seven (7). Revise vehicle parking calculation on sheet 1 of 2. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 7. Eight (8) foot wide access aisle is required for the handicap parking space. Sheet 2 of 2 shows a five (5) foot wide access aisle. 8. All existing or proposed easements and abandoned easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 9. If applicable, provide the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25) 10. The correct zoning classification for the subject property and the properties to the west and east of 14th Avenue is C-2. Revise the plan where applicable. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 11. Please correct the development designator, floor area ratio calculation and LUC Section under general note two (2) and site plan note and calculations on sheet 1 of 2. The correct designator in the C-2 zone for the proposed land use is "31". Maximum allowed F.A.R. is .90. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2) 12. Under zoning setback note four (4) on sheet 1 of 2 revise the word "industrial" to "commercial". 13. The correct amount for the handicap fine is $518 dollars. Revise detail on sheet 1 of 2 as required. 14. Remove all unnecesary lines, spot elevations, etc from the site plan. If they are required for grading provide an additional sheet with the required information. The site plan is difficult to read with so many lines and numbers. 15. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/21/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | A 5' masonry wall is required along the boundary adjacent to MH zoned property. |
| 10/25/2004 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | refer to zoning review comments regarding handicap parking. |
| 11/01/2004 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Correct all text and graphic overlays. Use a different line weight to separate graphs from one another. Use a gray line weight to indicate existing. Increase text height for Qs. Refer to redlines on Site Plan. 3. Indicate legal property description. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 A lot combination will be required. This form can be picked up at the Zoning counter. 4. Indicate project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 5. Indicate lot dimensions and bearings. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Correct text/graph overlays. 6. Indicate downspouts on all existing buildings and structures. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E 7. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 PAAL to an Arterial is 345' Near & 30' Far, PAAL to Local 185' Near & 110' Far, Local to Arterial 125' Far, Arterial to Local 165' Near. 8. Clearly identified vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The minimum acceptable width for two-way paved roadway is 24'. Show dimension for driveways and PAALs. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 9. If applicable, indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 10. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s). D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 11. Alley access is not allowed. Align driveway access to existing driveway across the street. Closed unused driveways. Show adjacent driveways. Show existing road medians. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 12. If applicable, indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 According to the Assessors Office, there's an alley that 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 14. Indicate location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.22 15. Label existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23 Label all contour lines; existing, proposed. Use a different line weight. Drainage Report 1. Indicate owner's name and address and or the name of the responsible party for maintaining the basin. 2. The proposed coefficient number used on page 6 and page D11 do not match. Correct and revise. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/02/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |